Sonny Liston’s 5 best wins 1 Patterson - Not much of a debate on this 2 Folley - He and Machen are pretty equal. I think Foley beating Machen right before they each faced Liston gives him the upper hand 3 Machen - I see nothing wrong putting him at 2 4 Williams - You can make a case for moving him up, I just don’t think his record is as deep as Folley and Machens 5 Valdez - At the end of his career but was still beating fringe contenders fairly consistent at the time. I think Harris has a good case for the 5 spot and to a lesser degree DeJohn. His top 4 wins seem like a lock.
I might disagree and call his resume average. Liston's resume of wins lacks depth in the sense they are mostly shorter smaller men, who didn't match up with him. Williams is the exception. Then again Sonny's not an easy fur or anyone pre 1960 to match up with! Most lineal champions have one really good win, but the best of them have hall of fame guys in spots #2 and #3.
I hate to say that, but the same can be said about Jeffries resume. I see double standards here regarding size. I view Liston's top wins as very good, but not among very best here. I prefer Louis and Schmeling lists and Jeffries+Rocky had comparable one.
How so? Jeffries beat a swarming puncher in Sharkey, a quick footed boxer in Corbett, and a deadly puncher in Fitzsimmons, all three of whom made the hall of fame. Three different styles. My comment is Liston beat too many small men with without power to bother him, which is accurate. Omit Marshall. Liston has but one hall of fame person on his resume of wins ( Patterson ) who was a terrible match up. The proof is in the pudding, as Patterson was Ko'd twice in round 1. Liston did not fight a tough brawler type or an all time puncher., unless you think Williams qualifies. I think Liston's resume is just okay, the impressive thing is how quickly he beat them ( Folley, Patterson Valdes, Williams ).
Liston beat Valdes and Williams. He beat Machen and Folley. He beat Patterson. That's variety of sizes and styles.
The obsession with size on this forum is mind boggling. If big men are so much better they should have been dominating at the time. The smaller men were faster and more skilled that’s why they won. Marciano and Liston and Jeffries beat basically everyone put in front of them big or small only thing was the best of their times were smaller men (except in Marcianos case where he was just as small).
I don't think size played a major role at heavyweight until the 1960's, and became a bigger factor with each passing decade. Pre 1960 histories big men were not very good boxers. This of course has changed. Liston was a skilled big man in his time. Tough to match up against. If not for Ali, he's champion for a few more years.
Liston wasn’t very big though at 6 ft. The reach of a 6”7 Man but still. That being said sub 200 fighters would remain competitive in the 60s and 70s. Steroids allowed for bigger men to be..more complete maybe?
Liston was big for his time. A shade over 6' tall and 210+ pounds. His tale of the tape shows an 84" reach ( which I think is a tad exaggerated ) and 15" fists. His legs, and biceps are bigger than most, even today. He rolled over smaller men. There wasn't puncher with a good chin in his time to match up with. Yes I do think steroids allowed the 190-200 pound men to bulk up and compete at heavyweight. Example Holyfield, James Toney, etc..
Sonny Liston 1-----Floyd Patterson 2-----Eddie Machen 3-----Zora Folley 4-----Cleveland Williams 5-----Nino Valdes Not making the cut--Roy Harris, really in a tie with Valdes. I went with Nino because he had a punch. Harris actually was fighting better and winning more consistently. Mike DeJohn--to me another Williams or Valdes type, only not as good. Liston has a lot of depth, and beat his opponents really impressively on the way up. But Archie Moore, Harold Johnson, and Bob Satterfield are 6-0 against Valdes, Williams, and Machen. Folley was KO'd by Lavorante and Jones, who in turn were beaten by Moore and Johnson. So as a top five list, I don't think this is one of the better ones.
It doesn't matter, beating Fitzsimmons is much more impressive than beating Williams. I just point out inconsistencies in Mendoza's criteria.
Liston was massive indeed. His built was unusual. I could see him weighing 220-230 lbs if he were fighting today