Pacquiao wins... Unless it is in Vegas? How old were they when they fought? Floyd 38 and Pacquiao 36? Pacquiao's boxing declines more with age obviously because of his style.
Their primes were at 130. Floyd had all his skill, the speed to match Pac, the style to beat him, and here he had power too. He's the logical pick.
He didn't decline testing. They could not agree on test dates. You know....especially how Floyd controlled WHEN testing started? Why is it you never cared that Floyd was the one who controlled test dates? AND was caught w/ illegal saline drip at home.
C'mon Lance, you know there's more to it than that. Floyd was 23 for Corrales, and had good performances at the weight before and after. Pacquiao beat Morales, Marquez, Barrera and Solis, looking great against all of them IMO, and given that he was a huge drainer for 122 and 126, and that he was literally starving to make 112, I'd say it being his 4th weight is irrelevant.
The Pacquiao who fought between 2009-2010 would beat the best version of Mayweather on points. Mayweather would have not been able to live with his speed and punch volume. Mayweather would have also not been able to deal with Pac's southpaw angles, which Pac actually had a lot of success with in their 2015 bout.
He did decline he declined random blood and urine testing with no cutoff pac wanted up to a certain amount of days he didn't agree and pulled out. Roach even admitted this