Greater boxing brothers: Marquez (JMM / Rafael) or Klitschko (Wladimir / Vitali)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Feb 28, 2019.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,478
    36,134
    Oct 12, 2010
  2. cleming

    cleming Active Member Full Member

    719
    177
    Sep 3, 2012
    Just compare who they fought and how they fought. Actually, I rate the Canizales brothers ahead of the K2.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  3. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,749
    46,699
    Mar 3, 2019
    Hmm, this is an interesting question. Props @Flo_Raiden, you always seem to get me thinking!

    In their own respective divisions, Wlad is clearly the best here. Everything he ever did is at heavyweight, and so his entire career being locked into a single division makes it a bit unfair to Juan Manuel, who's best wins are above and beyond his best weight (IMO FW). However let's not pretend like Wlad didn't put on as much as 30lbs. throughout his career. It just so happened that his weight class (heavyweight, obvs) encompassed all of it. Marquez's wins over Pac, yes; multiple, are undoubtedly the best achievements here. He was also much more skilled.

    So Juan Manuel is clearly the best pound for pound, whereas Wlad is clearly the best in his division. What about the lesser counter parts? Well, I always go for the guy with the better résumé, and that's Rafa, but it feels weird saying he's greater than Vitali for some reason. I think I agree with the person who said Vitali's affect on his division/boxing was more prevalent and for longer, that said I'd say Rafa's wins over Vasquez and Too Sharp take the cake. Being a two weight world champion doesn't hurt either. I'd also say Rafa was more skilled, but not as tough or well conditioned.
    An excellent point; thought provoking. If we're comparing these six fighters from a 'skill-for-skill' perspective, I think the Canizales brothers are without question the best pick. However for the proposed question, I'm going with Marquez brothers.
     
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,965
    88,015
    Aug 21, 2012
    Klitschkos rate higher.

    They ruled a decade and Wlad was within a whisker of getting the most HW defences ever. If he'd been a little more unscrupulous and had fought Arreola, Stiverne, Duhaupas etc instead of Tyson Fury and AJ, he'd have done it easily. Vitali is a legit H2H monster at the weight, even though his resume doesn't do him justice.
     
  5. SquaredCircle

    SquaredCircle Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,566
    2,737
    Oct 22, 2015
    The Marquez brothers. Vitali's resume is shockingly thin and comprised of a who's who of mid/late 2000's mediocrity. Rafael's wins over Vazquez, Austin, and Johnson are better than wins over Peter, Sanders, Chisora, Williams, and the like. Juan Manuel arguably has multiple wins over an all-time great, including an emphatic win over him at welterweight at a time when Pacquiao hadn't decisively lost since the first Morales fight. Huge win. Then you throw in his featherweight and lightweight wins, the win over an aging, but still sharp Barrera, and the fact that his losses were usually very debatable (not stoppage losses like Wladimir), and I'm pretty comfortable in saying he's a greater fighter. Juan Manuel proved himself to be at least the equal of an elite all-timer over four fights and three weight divisions; Wladimir's best win is what? Chris Byrd? Povetkin? Chagaev? Haye?
     
  6. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,821
    14,050
    Jul 28, 2009
    Well, let's just go ahead and compare their Johnsons. Two wins against Mark Johnson VS a win over each Kirk and Kevin Johnson. Whose Johnsons are bigger and better? I think the ones that were too sharp were the best. Let's just look at it that way.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,087
    13,836
    Oct 20, 2017
    The greatest fighter of those four is Juan Manuel Marquez. Rafa may have one time been rated higher but overall career wise, JMM should clearly be ranked as he greater of the two.

    With Wlad and Vitali it is a lot closer. I think Wlad will be seen as the greater because of the number of defenses he put in but he had durability issues. Vitali was cruder to watch but tougher.

    Obviously we're comparing one set of brothers against the other rather than to each other but just taking them on their own this is the way I see it.

    None of them imo crack the top 10 of their best weight class although Wlad is probably closest but that is obviously highly subjective (I have him around 15). Quality of opposition wise I don't think there's too much to shout about with the Klitschkos, the Marquez brothers both faced the tougher opposition.

    I'll say the Marquez brothers.
     
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,593
    May 30, 2019
    The best brothers are Baer brothers! ;)
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,721
    30,670
    Jun 2, 2006
    JMM for me.