Are Multiple World Champions Actually a Good Thing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sweetsci, Jul 31, 2020.



Are Multiple World Champions Actually a Good Thing?

  1. No. There should only be one world champion.

  2. Yes, but keep it to two belts only.

  3. Yes. The way it is provides more opportunities for boxers.

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,407
    Jan 10, 2007
    Yeah, guys like Jorge Arce...
     
  2. Bukkake

    Bukkake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,366
    3,461
    Apr 20, 2010
    A bad thing for hardcore nerds like us, who find our way to a forum like this - but something that has likely helped boost interest worldwide, as 99% of boxing fans have no idea what is going on!

    Average fans know nothing about lineal championships, or who the top guys are in the different divisions... because that's not what is important to them. They don't follow boxing like that. All they want is a local hero to root for, and with more titles, more fans can be made to believe they are watching something special (even if they aren't)... which puts bums in seats, or make them watch their idols on TV.

    So, as much as we hate it, these multible "world", regional, intercontinental or whatever strange titles they make up, no doubt help create interest, that would otherwise not be there.
     
    choklab and sweetsci like this.
  3. Bujia

    Bujia Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,564
    2,372
    Jul 2, 2020
    That’s a long term solution to a short term problem. If you even want to call it a problem. Creating entirely new belts for the purpose of drawing in new viewers that ultimately aren’t even in it for the long haul. Changing the landscape of the sport and continuing to devalue the meaning of the word “champion”. Further losing credibility with your actual fan base.

    All so some regional “fans” can tune in to root for their high school buddy and then likely never pay attention again?

    Pass. Hard pass.
     
    greynotsoold likes this.
  4. Oddone

    Oddone Bermane Stiverne's life coach. Full Member

    4,992
    10,652
    Aug 18, 2019
    Short answer, is of course, no. However no one wants to talk about the longer answer which is Nooooooooooooooooo.
     
  5. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,264
    10,191
    Mar 2, 2006
    Totally agree. Multiple titles are for the now, but undermines the entire structure of boxing. It's like putting up a nice pretty building but scoffing at building a foundation first. It ain't gonna last, guys. When diehards like us have a hard time knowing who's who, what chance does a casual fan have? And when you make a sport too difficult to follow, interest wanes. Aside from the ridiculous amount of world titles out there, there are also, the Continental Americas belt and the Silver belt and the International belt and the Inter-Continental belt. My God! Please melt them down into slag for all their meaningless worth. Last week I was watching some of this great old Gilette friday night fights. I watched Florentino Fernandez v Rory Calhoun, Joey Giambra v Yama Bahama, Hurricane Carter v Jose Gonzalez and Dick Tiger v Henry Hank. Even the casual fans knew these fighters. They rose to the top of a sport that could be followed. These fights didn't need some additional hardware to make them attractive to the public. And do you know what we called these fights? 10 rounders!
     
    sweetsci and Bujia like this.
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,511
    7,386
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yeah, sadly this is the truth.

    And yet it would cost nothing to change it.
     
  7. Skins

    Skins Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,060
    2,339
    Oct 20, 2011
    It's good for the fighters, not for the fans though.