Really miss Mayweather fighting. He's the greatest of this era by a very good margin, sigh!

Floyd was good of course. I also have Pacquiao as the best fighter of this era.

 

Nah mate. It's actually Jamie Moore, Light-Middleweight from Salford who beat Matthew Macklin and several scousers. He's the GOAT.

 

Aint **** over. Neither of those wins over a faded erik Morales are greater than pbfs win over canelo. Where was erik morales ranked p4p when pac beat him? Since when is beating a guy coming off a loss better than beating a top 10 p4p ranked undefeated star in canelo. In your mind only. Pbfs win over caneko is 1000000 light years better thaj pacs or raheems win over Morales the very fact that you're willing to die on a hill for this proves how irrational and how you can't be taken seriously when discussing all of this. PBF's win over canelo is arguably his best win in fact it was so highly thought of it helped him get fighter of the decade. It was one of the best wins of the last decade.

Youre a goddamn fool if you think mab ranks higher than canelo on any atg list I repeat canenlo is better than anyone pac ever beat. Fact!

Yes thanks for proving my point once again he's more well liked so people like you are willing to give pac more credit than he deserves and then turn around and discredit and make excuses against pbf because they dont like him.

He gets by it by circling away from it by being first not rushing in like a damn fool against a master counter puncher. It showed people how limited and how beatable pac was. Then again you offer nothing but excuses and ask me how he should do it. But why are you asking me this? Ask pac If pac is so much greater than pbf he should have figured it out by midway of the 1st fight.

Also I don't know if pac beats jlc or maidana he lost to a c level trashman in horn an overachiever in Bradley got ktfo against a no hoper and lost to a faded erik morales. I can tell you this pbf doesnt lose to anyone on pacs resume I know that and I also know he doesn't need a trilogy agsinst the likes of Bradley a shot erik Morales or 4 fights against jmm. He would beat them all clearly the 1st time like he beat jmm and pac.

You have been owned here exposed for your hypocrisy and excuse making. Lastly you asking me what pac is supposed to do shows me how desperate and out of your depth you're just like pac was in his fights with jmm and pbf. Ask pac that question not me afterall as you say he's greater than pbf. I know one person who could tell you this though despite not being a southpaw, pbf.

 

Should have lost to Castillo for sure. Without his clauses and bull**** he would have never looked so dominant against top class opponents. He had everything in his favour all the time. His whole '0' thing is just a bunch of bull**** and he knows it's the only thing he has to cling on to.

 

my heart bleeds for you
not to worry nye is coming up and you will get to see him so skinny Japanese cross boxer
or one better for your weak a55 big mc 2

 

You do realize that jlc was down 4-2 in there 1st fight so you're trying to tell me he didn't win but 1 more round for the entire fight? Lmfao! You didn't see the fight like most pbf haters just repeating what other haters have said.

Again excuses the story of the life of a pbf hater. He handed out boxing lessons to elite fighters you don't like him so you're bitter and want to claim that he wasn't great.

 

Cheers my man

 

You said Pac never beat JMM properly, Marquez never had a chance with the coward Mayweather though did he, him and everyone else.
Mayweather's tactics to get an upper hand every fight are embarrassing. He wasn't a boxer or fighter he's a business man and hugger, and suckerpuncher and coward, with no balls.
Castillo smashed him up.

 

Castillo 1 was a close fight whether or not you think he should have won. Why would you have more respect for Mayweather had Castillo gotten a SD nod? Mayweather wasn't even a ppv star at that point and watching it back I could see it going either way. Was he supposed to forfeit the win because he was actually in a close fight for once? Even if you have a problem with the decision he beat Castillo easily in the rematch so what's the point of bitching about a close decision in fight 1?

To the rest of your diatribe, just lol. He beat alot of very good fighters clearly and even they have respect for his skills even though they hate him. You are the one clinging on to a baseless theory that he wasn't a great fighter withour "clauses" (care to mention one specifically?). Before you chime in, Canelo volunteered a catchweight on his own.

Hatton was gonna beat Floyd until he didn't
PAC was gonna ko Floyd until he didn't
Canelo was going be a tough fight for Floyd until he wasn't
Floyd was scared of Cotto but then he beat him
Oscar was gonna beat Floyd until he didn't

Sound familiar?

 

Well it should annoy any boxing fan when fighters like Mayweather ( also a proven cheater, which we can add to the list), thanks, and Canelo get everything in their favour, clauses, contracts, refs and get decisions in every close fight, and don't take on opponents at their best.

It takes away from their accomplishments and loses respect from fans and that is their own fault.

 

Every champion used leverage for advantages from Dempsey refusing to fight blacks Ray Leonard demanding 12 oz gloves vs Hagler to Delahoya dictating what gloves Mayweather used to PAC draining Delahoya back down from 154 to 145

this turned out to be alot more cliche than I expected. Not really interested in talking about boxing with someone who can't respect good fighters on their merits and is obsessed with the business side of things which frankly you have zero actual insight to and are limited to reading rumors on twitter.

 

Bitter are we? Lol. Floyd beat everyone he faced FACT.

 

A coward doesn't shut out and embarrass a man your God couldn't beat clearly in 4 fights. Pac is so dumb and limited that he couldn't figure how not to keep getting hit by jmms right hand over the course of 4 fights and in the last fight was put into a coma by one. Lmfao!!!!! pbf doesnt keep getting hit by the same punch over and over and over it doesn't take him 4 fights to figure someone out. He does that by mid fight at the absolute latest. Levels!!!!! Lastly the only fighter who got smashed up was pac looking like a crash test dummy running into jmms right hand. Lmfao!!! Pbf never got smashed up dropped or knocked out or to a L you sound like a casual log off.

 

If Pacquiao could beat both Spence and Crawford then you would not miss Floyd anymore. You see what I'm saying?

 

Ive never said Floyd had no skills or that he couldnt box. He had incredible boxing talents BUT!
Instead of using them to get success. ,because to do so he'd have to learn to FIGHT!!!! he became the Vegas cash cow who was never going to be allowed to lose in Vegas EVER!!! By cherry pickin',
"friendly" judges & blatant cheating all together they managed to preserve his bogus 0 making him just a manufactured champion Whereas Pacquaio had to EARN everything he achieved & thats why FloydPac everyday