Too technically correct for Mike? Mike was a true technician. He had more overall ability than GG and he has a better resume. Mike’s best wins were pretty much against old fighters? What are you talking about? Please elaborate on that.
No problem. We’ll leave it at that. But don’t come on here questioning my reading comprehension, when you spent the first half of the thread obsessing over Sanderline Williams and Dave Tiberi, before getting aggressive when posters were telling you that they weren’t relevant to the discussion.
These guys are all over the place. They tell us not to focus on an old version of GG as he wasn’t at his best at that point, whilst at the same time they focus on Toney’s performances against Tiberi and Williams.
I know man it's like you could literally list 15 wins toney had that were better than gggs best win but somehow there is this magic aura that we don't see that makes them positive ggg is the best ever
LOL, this comment shows without a shadow of doubt that you do not know **** about boxing.Mc Callum was a brilliant technician and had a granit chin.Mike has a superior record than GGG too.You are just a nutcase
Because they can’t have an objective and fair debate when their favorite fighter is involved.But they are only a few posters and always the same.
LOL the RaEgE in this thread is remarkable. I do believe that if Toney is ever down on his luck he could live rent free in his fanboy's heads
Toney - narrow but clear UD. Just like Golovkin’s win over Canelo in the first fight. So probably gets ruled a draw.
The only person who has got upset and aggressive is the poster who you support. Come back and answer the points. As it stands, it appears that you 2 are the fanboys.
