If Margarito were to hurt Cotto....

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RingKing, Jul 8, 2008.


  1. RingKing

    RingKing Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,007
    612
    Feb 21, 2008
    and Cotto goes south of the border, will it be a "veteran" move, an accident, or too much of a coincidence and makes Cotto a dirty fighter?
     
  2. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Greatâ„¢ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
  3. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    Too much coincidence. If he does any of that **** against Margarito I hope Margarito drops a classic uppercut right in his scrotum.
     
  4. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
  5. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Veteran move. Cotto is not a dirty fighter but he will do whatever is necessary in order to survive/win (including foul moves).
     
  6. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,645
    Feb 1, 2007
    if he hits Margo in the nuts after Margo has him wobbled then its obviously an accident
     
  7. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Veteran move AND dirty fighter. Hittin someone in the balls on purpose is dirty no matter what. But hey, you're allowed one, might as well make it count. :D
     
  8. Cadillac Man

    Cadillac Man Member Full Member

    196
    0
    Nov 15, 2007
    That would be a good prop bet for Vegas what round does Cotto go low...I'd bet if he does get hurt he'll go low...3 Weeks away MAN I CAN'T WAIT.
     
  9. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Obviously an accident. And a coincidence. Not to mention competely unintentional.
     
  10. jabo

    jabo Active Member Full Member

    578
    0
    Jan 18, 2008
    i think it depends on how that low blow looks

    cause in the zab fight i didnt see it was intentional the first low blow but the second low blow surely was