Tyson Fury is the best P4P boxer on the planet

Can't believe the amount of people that were jerking off over Lomachenko especially Bellew (lol), saying he was the best p4p fighter on the planet, despite having so few professional fights. He looked like a cracking fighter, but not nearly enough pro fights to be considered the best.

For me it's Tyson Fury, the reason I say this? Skill + Insane Physicality. It's his physical attributes on top of his skill level that separate him from the rest and make him so insane.

Because on top of being extremely skilled, with the ability to fight in different styles/approaches, and being a very well round boxer, he's got incredible physical abilities, and that's what makes him the best IMO.

Insane stamina, even when he's overweight, a great chin and powers of recovery. Insane speed for someone that's 6ft 9 and often overweight, and insane reflexes. He has a great offense and easily the best defence of any boxer at heavyweight. He also has good survival instincts and keeps his head when hurt.

He's had his bad moments where's not performed great and looked vulnerable, like against Wallin, but lets face it, he wasn't fighting near 100% in that fight, and didn't look focused at the beginning.

His only massive negative is that sometimes he doesn't take smaller fights seriously.

 

40 year old Wlad would probably be rank 3 right now. 40 year old Wlad almost beat AJ!

It's the fact that Fury has dominated both Wilder and Wladmir so convincingly that's impressive, as well as being undefeated also.

Wilder would still KO anyone bellow Joshua, and I'm convinced it's still a 50/50 between AJ and Wilder.

Wilder's boxing abilities suck, but it doesn't matter, he still KO's everyone. If he can catch Fury, he can catch anyone in the division.

Any people are now gonna say lopez because he beat Loma and people jerking off over Loma too quickly.

At least Fury has 30 fights under his belt. Lopez and Loma have only just over a dozen fights each. Ridiculous insinuating they deserve to be considered best P4P yet. Stupid.

If you don't think Fury's dominance over Wlad or Wilder is impressive, who do you see in the HW division beating Fury?

Joshua? Who only just made it past Wlad who Fury dominated?

 

I also think it's funny that people mention people's age as if it automatically makes it less of an achievement if you beat them. You have to look at each individual fighter on who they are.

A 40 year old Wlad is Wlad out of his prime, but it doesn't mean he was an easy opponent. The Wlad who fought Joshua would still beat everyone in the division besides the top 2. I'm confident of that. He'd be atleast top 5 quality, and Fury was clearly dominant back then and he's improved since.

 

I'm sorry, but dominating Wlad, regardless of his age, was a fantastic achievement. Fury was completely Dominate over Wlad.

Joshua didn't dominate Wlad at all. He had a better start, gassed himself out, then Wlad took most of the rounds after the 5th. The score cards were very close.

I had Wlad up on rounds before the 11th, and I'm sure I remember one of the judges had Wlad winning also.

Joshua didn't dominate Wlad over the course of a match, and if you look at the match stats, Wlad landed considerably better on Jabs, and was slightly inferior on power shots.

Fury dominated Wlad

Joshua beat him, but not by that much. The 11th round was the deciding factor. Joshua got his second wind and finished him off. If it wasn't for that, the match was on the verge of being even.

 

Just furthering my point above, here's the proof -https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/boxing/article-4459454/Anthony-Joshua-vs-Wladimir-Klitschko-winner-SCORECARD.html

One judge scored it 95-94 for wlad, the others had it 95-93,96-93.

I personally had Wlad up by one round as well at the time.

Fans scorecards were divided, some people felt Joshua won by 2-3 rounds, some people had Wlad winning by 1-2 rounds also.

So the match was close, if it wasn't for the 11th round carnage, the fight could have gone either way on the scorecards.