In a list of the best 50 P4P fighters in the last 50 years, in a 1996 edition of Ring magazine, Pernell Whitaker was rated No.21 while Gomez was rated 22nd in the list, should Whitaker have been rated above Gomez and were both men rated correctly? Info the ring gave on Pernell: Quality of competition: 8 Bouts vs Top 50 fighters: 2 Why he`s there: Career loses? With ''Sweet Pea'' it`s hard to find rounds he lost. What he could have done to improve his ranking: He could have still done it by beating Trinidad and/or Norris. Gomez info: Quality of competition: 8 Bouts v top 50 fighters: 3 Why he`s here: He`s arguably the finest boxer-puncher of the early '80`s. What he could have done to better his ranking: Give himself a chance by properly making weight for his bout v Salvador Sanchez.