Mike Weaver vs. Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vince Voltage, Jul 25, 2015.


  1. MMAMIKE

    MMAMIKE Member banned Full Member

    136
    29
    May 15, 2020
    WEAVER BUSTS UP FRANK TKO 7
     
  2. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,411
    2,976
    Oct 18, 2004
    Weaver ko's Bruno in 5.
     
    William Walker likes this.
  3. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,925
    6,803
    Dec 10, 2014
  4. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,925
    6,803
    Dec 10, 2014
    Home court advantage won't matter because Frank won't make it to the final bell.
     
  5. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,757
    11,696
    Mar 23, 2019
    I don't think so, either. Weaver had Tyson-level power (though not his hand speed or overall boxing ability). Bruno would definitely make a really good fight of it, but Weaver in 10. Frank would eventually start making mistakes and walk into a very bad punch.
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Frank sparred with Weaver in 82-83.. He felt he handled himself well with Weaver and fancied he could beat him if ever they fought.

    Frank usually allowed the pressure to get to him in big fights, but he won the McCall fight based on having known him from earlier sparring sessions.

    Weaver was a better fighter, on a big occasion Weaver has more chance of winning. I am inclined to believe if he had never previously shared a ring with Weaver that Frank would allow the pressure of a nation to build up on him and lock up and implode like always after six rounds or so..

    However! Frank knew Weaver. He sparred with him on trips to America. Weaver was a slow starter. Frank was a fast starter. I recon, The Weaver who fought Tony Anthony in 1984 would have lost to the 1984 version of Frank Bruno, and I firmly believe this. Especially with Frank going into ring with the prior knowledge of having sparred together.

    But you put the 1979- 1981 Weaver into a match with Bruno in a football stadium with any version of Bruno, who has not sparred with Mike Weaver, and Frank is getting knocked spark out.
     
  7. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,034
    13,700
    Oct 20, 2017
    Growing up, I loved Frank Bruno. It's hard to imagine how popular he was in the UK at one time. He was popular in a way that fighters just aren't anymore. When he took the WBC title from Oliver McCall it was a moment of national celebration - finally, finally, Britain had a heavyweight champion (What's that Lennox? Shhh.)

    So it pains me to say that I would pick Weaver to win and most likely by stoppage too.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,053
    49,114
    Apr 27, 2005
    Weaver is the safe money.
     
  9. William Walker

    William Walker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    9,171
    Apr 9, 2020
    Another pick 'em fight. Weaver might do nothing all night and Bruno could easily UD Mike, or he could bomb him out in 1 or 2 rounds. However, w/ Bruno's shaky chin, it would take just one punch from Mike. I slightly favor Mike. He could pull off a Smith or Witherspoon-style late knockout, except cleaner, it would be a one-punch KO.
     
  10. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Weaver in his prime I think could hang in there long enough to take Bruno out especially in a 15 round fight,