Was Kid Gavilan a better fighter P4P than George Foreman?

Leonard fought Duran's fight. Montreal Duran's fight. Copied and pasted from Tokyo Douglas. Still deserving of a mention. He didn't like movers. But his footwork was economical. As opposed to slow. Duran's fight. Drew the colour line. Stalin was worse.

 

He's a real person who evolved into a trolling algorithm.

 

Yeah, I don't see the relevance though.

Well, let's start with what you think is wrong. Do you agree that Stalin was worse, or are you like one of "them" types?

 

I think we're on the same page now. :deal

Edit: That emoticon text doesn't work anymore. That is just not right.

 

All a sudden non-Russian-speaking people are experts about Joseph Stalin?

 

Stalin belongs to the world.

 

I think he was a greater Welterweight but he didnt have success moving up to Middleweight. Overall I guess you could put Griffith above him for his success @60. H2H Gavilan would win I believe.

 

A historical figure needs to be considered in historical context, how did the leaders of other states rule their countries, what condition the state was in, internally and externally (threats and restrictions from other countries), what were the alternatives (without using hindsight). Most of this is omitted in American and European books, they are mostly accentuating bad things about him, an outright moster and tyrant. It's much more complex than that, and it's not like European or American politicians were much better or better at all, at the time.

 

Hey, he's one of my favourites, Senya. Better leader than Obummer or any of the Dems from my country, certainly. Also, always felt he had very kind eyes. You can tell a lot from the windows to the soul. Unless you're a dirty Uke and you have no soul.

 

Hey, you're preaching to the choir here, my good man.

Stalin's the G.O.A.T in my world.

 

I'm not so sold on Marlon Starling though, for the record.

 

Dude, you have GOT to see the movie he did called "Super Size Me."