1. Canelo 2. Crawford 3. Usyk 4. Teofimo 5. Estrada 6. Spence 7. Inoue 8. Lomachenko 9. Berchelt 10. Taylor
Having a draw and a loss that should have been two wins, over a P4P talent like Canelo Alvarez, with one of the best resumes in the sport, should count for something shouldn't it? Especially when you add in his list of decent to solid wins at MW, which are more impressive than anything Crawford has ever accomplished. Pac would rate higher, but he has legit lost several times, and Teofimo has one solid win, and that win was debatable. A draw could be argued, regardless... Fury didn't make most people's top 10's when he beat Wlad, Ruiz didn't when he beat AJ, and Sor Rungvisai didn't when he beat Chocolatito. So that one's hard to call.
I love TTT, one of his first cheerleaders in the General, but thus far, he doesn't have a single win that's the caliber of Wlad and Wilder.
Canelo Inoue Estrada Usyk Crawford Spence Teo Loma Berchelt Beterbiev honorable mention Taylor, Fury, GGG, Manny, SSR, Roman
1.Inoue 2.Lomachenko 3.Crawford 4.Alvarez 5.Usyk 6.Beterbiev 7.Estrada 8.Bivol 9.Spence 10.Davis 11.Ioka 12.Mikey Garcia 13.Taylor 14.Warrington 15.Joshua 16.GGG 17.Gonzalez 18.Pacquiao 19.Rigondeaux 20.Lara 21.Wangek 22.Lopez 23.Berchelt 24.Briedis 25.Valdez
Wilder is a lesser fighter than Prograis but of course he’s more mainstream because he’s a heavyweight with a lot of KO power. Doesn’t make him a better fighter though.
Because I rate wins over Danny Garcia, Shawn Porter, Mikey Garcia, Lamont Peterson, prime Kell Brook, over the handful of corpses on Crawford's resume, and Jeff Horn and Viktor Postol.
Everyone knows Canelo has ability. But why put him on any P4P list until he legit beats other prime champions without PEDs, judges or weight clauses. It's absurd. A bit of a recap: Cotto fight > Massive size advantage, Cotto old Khan fight > Massive size advantage, likely PEDs, Khan already chinned many times Liam Smith fight > Not elite, likely PEDs Chavez fight > Weight drained, post prime opponent Golovkin I fight > Lost, corrupt judging, likely PEDs ~Officially busted for PEDs Golovkin II > Close fight, could have lost with different judges Fielding fight > Weight claused opponent, not elite Jacobs fight > post prime Kovalev fight > Weight claused opponent recently almost TKO'd, post prime Seriously, basically every major opponent here is either OLD, DRAINED, ROBBED or some combo. Be honest about it. To put this all into perspective, if Canelo fought: Young Cotto, similar weight > Canelo quite possibly beaten Chavez that beat Lee > Canelo quite possibly beaten Younger Golovkin > Canelo loses twice and is possibly stopped Jacobs that fought Golovkin > Toss up Younger Kovalev > Canelo ends up like Pascal, during a funny walk into the corner, shelling up and being stopped. If Canelo stops or legit beats Smith with no controversy (hard to control his PED-ing still), it would at least be a prime elite opponent not drained or robbed.
Happy to see somebody else with Ioka, he's a four division champion and unified in minimumweight, no reason he shouldn't be rated highly, even with an MD loss and an SD loss.
Well, unfortunately P4P lists are not built around skill level. So that's irrelevant to this conversation. But we all know what this is all about, just another AJ fan trying to tear down Tyson Fury. Jesus you fools are so transparent.
