I need some help. What are the biggest robberies of the last 20 years? - Every Sven Ottke fight - sturm vs odlh - ggg vs canelo 1 and 2 - ward vs kovalev 1 - leonard vs hagler - holyfield vs lewis 1 - lomachenko vs salido - lara vs canelo - Paxcman vs horn - Bradley vs prudnenikov - huck against a lot of guys (especially lebedev) - holyfield vs valuev - miranda vs abraham Who knows other robberies
a lot of these are not robberies but just close fights. for something to be the "biggest robbery, " shouldn't it be an obvious UD for one person going either draw or to the other person? like why have leonard hagler on there (not a robbery at all) but not leonard hearns 2 (even SRL says Tommy won)? where's sweet pea vs chavez? Bradley vs Pacman is way more of a robbery than Bradly vs Provodnikov. holy lewis 1 and holy valuev were robberies, that is true. the rest of this list is dubious and seems like just times you were mad about a decision.
Pernell Vs Ramirez And also Vs chavez Fury Vs mcdermott 1 Marquez Vs Pacquiao 3 Miguel Vasquez Vs O'Hara Davies n Lewis ritson Ottke Vs Reid
It’s more than 20 years, but the most outrageous robbery ever is still Juan Coggi-Eder Gonzalez 1 It’s bad enough to win 8 of 12 rounds and lose the decision. It’s even worse when you really win by knockout or win by DQ on three separate occasions, but the ref/timekeeper rules than you didn’t, and then you lose the fight. This content is protected https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Juan_Martín_Coggi_vs._Eder_González
1. Roy Jones Jr's gold medal olympic fight. 2. BS ref stoppage of Meldrick Taylor vs JCC. Taylor was robbed of his victory.
Pretty much. Leonard-Hagler is like the most evenly debated controversial decision ever. I get the impression if you polled 100 big time boxing fans/historians and asked who won, 45 would say Ray, 45 would say Marvin, and 10 would have it even. I would be among those 10. Golovkin-Canelo 2 is another very close fight l that I scored 114-114. Not a robbery at all.
I beat Mike Tyson many times before I beat Super Macho Man. All I did was use that code and fight him over and over again until I could finally beat him.
Foreman v Briggs Holyfield v Valuev Holyfield: Gold medal Los Angeles Holmes v Spinks I and II Pearson v K. Taylor I
Debatable decisions are not robberies. Just because your favourite fighter/s lost a decision does not make it a robbery which I sense is the agenda behind this thread. Golovkin lost a close fight to Canelo same as Lomachenko lost to Salido in a close fight, that's what the history books will quite rightly show and all the bitterness, crying and shouts of robbery ain't changing it.
Fury Wilder & Fury McDermott 1 were not robberies. One judge giving it wide to Wilder was corruption, Alejandro Rochin. The fight itself Fury 114-112 was an average scorecard. If the fight was ruled in Wilders favour then we can start talking robbery. McDermott the Referee giving it to Fury is just a stupid system that changed consequently. Again a close fight many giving it to John by a couple of points. Marquez Vs Pacquiao 3 is one of the first robberies I saw as a boxing fan where my heart sank into my stomach I felt so bad for Marquez. Then Bradley Pacquiao 1.
- Every Sven Ottke fight - This content is protected - sturm vs odlh - This content is protected - ggg vs canelo 1 and 2 - This content is protected - ward vs kovalev 1 - This content is protected - leonard vs hagler - This content is protected - holyfield vs lewis 1 - This content is protected - lomachenko vs salido - This content is protected - lara vs canelo - This content is protected - Pacquiao vs horn - This content is protected - Bradley vs prudnenikov - This content is protected - huck against a lot of guys (especially lebedev) - This content is protected - holyfield vs valuev - This content is protected - miranda vs abraham - This content is protected