Losses don't really matter. Not in the grand scheme of things. If Pacquiao wasn't good enough to beat a faded Morales, why did he end up beating the much bigger Miguel Cotto, or Tim Bradley, or Antonio Margarito? And I really think it went over your head, pimp. I was taking the **** out your 'stop!'. Pacquiao has a better resume than Floyd. Neither are close to the best fighter who ever lived, but Floyd is closer.
Another Pacquaio thread, another derailment from Mayweather fans who just can't stand the fact that people vastly prefer Pacquiao to Mayweather and hold losses against him, as if the ACTUAL GREATEST FIGHTER WHO EVER LIVED AND WOULD SPANK TEN MAYWEATHERS (Sugar Ray Robinson) never lost. It's all so tiresome.
On steroids, you got proof or is it just a guess so Mayweather doesn’t look stupid after getting pushed like never before by maidana... you sneaky little bugger you lol, I seen ya
Don't bring up steroids or PED use, man. Floyd used illegal IVs in the Pac fight. Floyd was on FightHype video with Ben Thompson the night he received illegal IVs. He was laughing and chillin'. Hardly the sign of a man who was so severely dehydrated thar he needed 750 ml of IV fluids.
They need to stop you included! Margo aint **** but a bum with loaded gloves and tim Bradley is solid but not a special fighter who pac lost to I might add. If Crawford was around 140 when Bradley was there you never would have heard of him. Cotto is great arguably pacs best win. The problem is people let their love or hate for a fighter determine how they rank him. Pac is well liked so he gets more credit than he deserves the comment earlier about him being the best ever proves that. Btw loses do matter why even fight why even declare a winner. Loses do matter especially bad ones. They also matter when you're ranking fighters and talking who's greater.
He tested positive dummy. He was on the gear back then to extend his career that was basically over kinda like your hero kovalev who just got popped did. btw pbf was past his prime 37 and beat maidana 2x try again .
Pbf never tested positive and was cleared. Remember it was pac who turned down the fight back in 2009 because of testing not the other way around. 118-110 forever!
Who gives a ****? When they fought pbf schooled him making wishful thinking pac fans like you lose sleep since that night and I love it. Carry on the love fest though pac is an atg just not as good as pbf.
Pbfs win over canelo is better than any win pac has his win over pac himself is better than anything pac has done. Marciano resume is 100000 light years behind that of pbf horrible comparison.
His achievements prove he’s up there as one of the best ever, me personally, I see no problem with someone saying he’s the best ever. Most people in boxing pick Pac having a better career than Mayweather, Hopkins said it recently himself. You’ve got to be honest with yourself before you can be honest with others Pimp. Make that change an accept the truth that I’m giving you an watch how much better you will feel
I mean, clearly, you give a ****, and it's bordering on pathetic. You can't let a single thread go by without mentioning, "Haha Pacquiao fans, Mayweather beat him, Mayweather's better, I bet you lose sleep over it don't you?" No Pimp, I'm legitimately too busy to lose sleep over a boxing match I have never watched that happened 6 years ago and five years too late. If you want to celebrate a flyweight finally hitting an unsurmountable wall at welterweight more power to you I guess. But there's a reason all of their boxing peers from Holyfield to Hopkins all look up to and admire Manny and just give a nodding respect to Floyd. Try not to lose sleep over that.
Bradley's own mother doesn't think he won that fight any more than Floyd's thinks he won the first Castillo fight. Hello, Pot. May I introduce you to my friend Kettle? You'll get along famously. No, he get's "more credit than he deserves" because what he accomplished in the sport is insane. Literally insane. It would be considered impossible if it did not happen before our eyes. Being well-liked is just a product of, 'not being an ass-hole'. Pacquiao is neither Henry Armstrong nor Sugar Ray Robinson, so you're right, he's not the best ever (he's most likely not even top ten). But at least he doesn't have the cheek to call himself that unlike a certain someone (who is also not even top ten). Yes, wins and losses absolutely matter when talking about whose greater. However, without CONTEXT of those wins and losses, they're just meaningless statistical numbers. Otherwise, Julio César Chavez leaves both Pacquaio AND Mayweather in the dust and runs off laughing. Surely you can understand at least that much.
