1-Smith got better wins? Do you mean in terms of quantity or quality? Because in terms of quality he does not have a single win better than Foreman's win over moore and that is not up for debate. 2-you don't take points away from the fighter who won because their opponent made a mistake. Again, why is it like pulling teeth for you to simply give Foreman credit for executing a good game plan? There are literally dozens of videos breaking down how he beat Moore: This content is protected This content is protected 3-well you're either blind or stupid because i already posted the link showing that the WBA had him ranked 10th: https://boxrec.com/media/index.php/George_Foreman_vs._Adilson_Rodrigues It wasn't "my" claim it's on boxrec. 4-I call it 2 losses and a draw because that's what his record says. Stop trying so hard to project and get under my skin, you suck at it. I did in fact see the Smith vs Tyson fight and nearly quit twice while watching because of how bad it was. You can literally search my posts on this forum where I break down specific key moments in the fight. Smith looked HORRIBLE in this fight spamming clinches and taunting 70% of the time but you tried to play it off and give him brownie points for "going the distance" with a prime Tyson as if hugging him to death to survive is some sort of marvelous feat. That you even went there speaks volumes about your delusion. 5-you are the only person in this thread who mentioned Briggs breathing heavy. People thought Foreman won because he outlanded Briggs by more than 60 punches and controlled the pace from start to finish. I suppose the US government were being "rabid fanboys" when they investigated what they thought was clearly a robbery?
You're so triggered. Witherspoon would knock out Moorer any day of the week. Oquendo is probably in the WBA rankings right now.
There was the "hole in his heart" controversy and Foreman looked like an ideal payday for Moorer. It likely would've been shortly after the Foreman fight had Moorer won.
"YoUrE sO tRiGgReD" says the guy who responds to facts like a 16 year old girl for 14 pages. Go ahead and make a poll asking if the Witherspoon who lost to Smith would beat the Moore who lost to Foreman. I dare you.
Can't make a poll that excludes Foreman's fanboys who use laughing emojis to prove they aren't riled up.
Thats an interesting fight 1986 spoon vs 1994 moorer........man the moorer ,george beat ,was such a good fighter compared to the bloated uninterested post foreman moorer
I think Evander was humbled by both his PED use and Moorer that night, yes Foreman was indeed an ideal payday in retrospect.
You guys are going for another 20 pages of that? https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/donovan-ruddock-v-george-foreman-1991-who-wins.643631/ Again with no poll ? You guys think thats such a brilliant bout? I´ll repeat myself here with some extras, because that fight would go the distance with very high chance and not that much action, depending on how Ruddock is going to fight: "1) Foreman had a solid chin. Its very unlikely he gets stopped in here. Nevertheless, this might depend on his opponents giving him too much respect, which Stewart didn´t after it got heaty. 2) Ruddock went 7 and 12 with Tyson, with the 7 round stoppage beeing premature. Got up against a big puncher in Smith. He was there to get it on in 3 to 4 occasions with solid punchers. 3) Foreman went 10 with Stewart, 8/10 with Coetzer, 12 with Morrison, 10 with Moorer, 12 with Schulz, 12 with Grimsley and 12 with Savarese. About every one of them did not have the chin or recuperation after beeing hurt of a Ruddock. 2) and 3) lead to the conclusion that its not very likely Ruddock getting out of there before 10 or 12. This fight most likely would end in a decision. Ruddock didn´t give Tyson alot of respect, which is bad news for George imho. He would take too much punishment in contrast of gaining too little. But thats another story. I lead towards a Ruddock decision with Foreman face looking worse than the Stewart debacle, fighting a quicker 27 years old fellow, who is bigger than Morrison, Moorer, Stewart and Coetzer and got better chin. Foremans best chance is to catch Ruddock beeing sloppy and win a decision with an 10/8 round."
foreman ducked donovan ruddock .....im gonna say donovan ruddock by 10 rd tko with foreman all puffed up and stopped by dr/ref...
Why can´t you guys stay on the ground for this fight Foreman took everything thrown at him over a comeback of ten years and fought on.....
