Yeah I used to find him entertaining, although he was pretty obviously a hype job. He's become the butt of the jokes now though that's for sure.
Yeah and @Dubblechin goes to stupid lengths to make up excuses for him and try to twist his words like a politician...
I'm not arguing. Wilder defended his title once against Fury, not twice as you said, he lost his other defence. Simple.
Cracks me up how he can’t grasp defended and defense. He had two title defense against Fury. He successful defended the tittle in the first fight and he lost the 2nd. Saying he defended his title twice would mean he won both fight. It’s simple English.
No, saying a champion defended the title twice means he put his title on the line twice. Saying he only defended it one time would mean he only put it on the line one time. Whether it was a successful or unsuccessful defense is a different matter. Both were title defenses. (Is this really necessary?)
Wilder is dangerous and has no belts and he has become an embarrassment to the sport, his behaviour isn’t that of a champion who has intentions to win a belt. There’s literally no reason for anyone to fight him and he’s done it to himself. Speak it believe it receive it. lol irrelevant is an understatement
You are a the classic case I see where you are wrong but to suborn to admit it. Look and read your own sentences. Do you see the word in your own response? I highlighted and made it bold for you. Your dumbass agreed with what we just said. The word defense and the word defended have two different meaning. Now I will ask you, Is this really necessary?
No, I didn't. (LOL) And, since you're throwing around grammar lessons, it is "too stubborn." And I can highlight things, too. On October 29, 1974, George Foreman defended the heavyweight championship of the world against Muhammad Ali in Kinshasa at “The Rumble in the Jungle,” a fight that would rightly achieve legendary status and go down as one of the most monumental events in boxing history. https://www.badlefthook.com/2019/11...t-michael-moorer-video-highlights-boxing-news Is the writer implying Foreman WON? No, he's saying Foreman defended his title against Ali. Ali won it that night from Foreman because the title was on the line. Maybe you should argue with him. I'm done with this nonsense. Christ. STAY IN SCHOOL
Yes, the only one. You can do a simple search and find a thousand excerpts from books, magazines, web articles and newspapers of people saying FIGHTER A defended his title against FIGHTER B at this location ... and FIGHTER A didn't win ... but you won't find many where someone doling out grammar advice spells too stubborn as "to suborn." And I am so done with this. With that, I'm putting you and your buddies on ignore. I award you no points. And may God have mercy on your souls. (LOL) This content is protected
