2003 Lennox Lewis vs 2017 Anthony Joshua

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GOAT Primo Carnera, Mar 18, 2021.



Who prevails?

  1. Joshua via decision.

  2. Joshua via stoppage.

  3. Lewis via decision.

  4. Lewis via stoppage.

  5. Draw.

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,364
    1,015
    Sep 5, 2004
    I believe Lewis beats Joshua H2H.

    But that version of Lewis that stepped in against Vitaly was ready for the taking. He lacked the endurance the sharpness that we usually see from Lennox. The 2017 version of Joshua was still a confident fighter whose instinct was to engage and not retreat and pick his spots. I think he would outgun Lewis in about 9 rounds.

    Joshua TKO9.
     
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,049
    Oct 28, 2017
    Very debatable.

    I think Joshua will go down as a better heavyweight than Vitali, he might have already acheived more.
     
  3. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,097
    6,703
    Sep 11, 2018
    Levels.

    Lewis. Via KO.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. Pete grigg

    Pete grigg New Member Full Member

    52
    36
    Jul 1, 2020
    Lennox in 6-7 rds . Joshua is a great bloke and decent fighter but hasn’t got anything on his record to compare with Lennox
     
  5. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,049
    Oct 28, 2017
    I feel like people are matching Joshua with a prime or near prime version of Lewis, rather than the there for the taking Lewis that Vitali fought.

    I think a Prime Lewis was a much better fighter than Joshua, but in this case it's a near prime Joshua with a not prime very unfocused Lewis, I think it'd be close, I think Lewis could well win, but I'd lean towards Joshua.
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2021
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,380
    17,879
    Jul 21, 2012
    Vitali was not a better boxer than Joshua.

    Joshua clearly has better command of the fundamentals than Vitali did. . Joshua has better punch selection and is far better combination puncher. He is more accurate and has higher ring IQ. He can adapt and execute different gameplans.

    Vitali couldn't land a solid glove on Kevin Johnson. AJ ran through Johnson like he was nothing becaue he had the angles and varation to open Johnson up and take him out.. Vitali didn't didn't have a clue what to do with Johnson. The proof is right here

    This content is protected
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  7. Toney F*** U

    Toney F*** U Boxing junkie Full Member

    6,289
    9,671
    Oct 16, 2019
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    48,306
    18,758
    Jan 3, 2007

    Well, You’d pick chuck Wepner to beat the kilts, so I’d say your perspective needs to be taken with a grain of salt. And how old was Vitali when he fought Johnson again ?
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,380
    17,879
    Jul 21, 2012
    You were simply wrong in what you said and thats all there is too it.

    Vitali lost only 8 rounds in his career yeah? Joshua would have lost zero. There is no way a 200 pound Chris Byrd who got off the sofa on a weeks notice is beating a well prepared Joshua.

    What AJ did to Johnson shows you exactly what he would have done to Vitali's resume.

    If AJ fought Vitali's opponent selection he would look like the second coming of Mike Tyson

    This content is protected


    Furthermore , AJ has already surpassed Vitali. Better accomplishment and a better resume. Not to mention he avenged his only loss , unlike Vitali
    Quite possible he beats Fury too and become the greatest HW since Lennox Lewis. Either way winner of that fight will go down in history as one of the greats
     
  10. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,494
    Sep 16, 2012
    Although I disagree

    It's true that Vitali has a lackluster resume
     
  11. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,380
    17,879
    Jul 21, 2012
    Disagree with what? Vitali's technique was horrible.
     
  12. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,494
    Sep 16, 2012
    Worked for his size and for what he is

    Most adopt a technique or style that fits physical attributes and strengths

    Muhammad Ali who I consider #1 at heavyweight didn't do everything correct by the book yet he reached an unparalleled status ...

    Vitali has a garbage resume though
     
    Last edited: Mar 18, 2021
  13. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,380
    17,879
    Jul 21, 2012
    Difference is Ali beat around 20 guys ranked on the all time great list. . Vitali's best win is Sam Peter. 6 foot Eddie Chambers can also claim Peters as his best win.

    Ali didn't do any do everything by the book but he still has supreme coordination , footwork , timing , defense , speed and athleticism.

    Anybody would look good against the slow face first plodders Vitali hand selected. His style worked because nobody was good enough to exploit all his glaring weaknesses. Nobody expect a poor version of Lewis and a Byrd who took the fight on a weeks notice.

    Having physical advantages over smaller opponents doesn't mean Vitali is a better boxer than Joshua. Joshua has skills Vitali does not have , that as clear as day.
     
  14. KidDynamite

    KidDynamite Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,857
    1,494
    Sep 16, 2012
    Vitali has a garbage resume I agree

    But I disagree on height ... Joe Frazier was not even 6' ... Mike Tyson wasn't 6' ... Both were great champions .... And Tyson continued to fight in the 90s and early 00s ....

    Ali would be undefeated if he fought Vitalis resume but when has Vitali ever ducked anyone? It was Lewis who ducked Vitali into retirement
     
  15. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,380
    17,879
    Jul 21, 2012
    Well , you can only prove how good you are based on resume.