Now do Corrie Sanders vs. Steve Zouski, Mike Dixon, Prince Tukane, Mike Rouse, Anthony Wade, Mike Dixon, Mike Evans, Johnny Nelson, Nate Tubbs, Garing Lane, Nikolay Kulpin, Ross Puritty, Daniel Bispo and Osborn Machimana ... and tell us what's wrong with those knockouts ... other than the fact that Sanders didn't knock any of them out.
One last question ... who was the WORST guy Sanders COULDN'T knock out? See the difference? One guy knocked out everyone, even the bad fighters, and only lost to the very best fighter in the whole world right now. The other guy couldn't even knock out a dozen or more losers, and got wasted by a some pretty bad ones. You'll catch up someday. Really gotta go. No offense. Happy Easter.
And ... you lost me again. (LOL) You know who Deontay Wilder is, right? (LOL) Your posts are like watching Evel Knievel crash at Caesars Palace in slow motion. Just more brutal by the second. This content is protected Goodnight.
Do you think Wilder could win (LOL) / take the punishment Czyz did against Holyfield Please do not tell me you think Wilder beats Holyfield
You lost me because you can't pay ****ing attention, I said Purritys win over Klitschko was better than any win Wilder has...go, please, please argue with that.
Nope, he couldn;t KO Stiverne despite hitting him with everything, who is chinny himself, then they gave a 20 stone Stiverne a rematch so that they could say Wilder has "KO'D all he's fought" manufactured bolloxks, I thought Stiverne might have a chance until I seen the state of him at the weigh ins, disgraceful, embarrassing, only Don King could make a title match like that
FFS when they cherrypicked a fat cokehead alcoholic obese Fury for Wilder I was worried because I thought Fury was in such a terrible condition that even Wilder could beta him... then I rewatched a few of Wilders fights and remembered how ****ing **** he was and siad Fury can still beat this guy" which he did despite the robbery, a bit more fitness later and he made Wilder look like he'd never stepped in a gym before and Wilder may never fight again because of all the smoke blown up his ass If he couldn;t beat that disgraceful Fury who showed up in the first fight, then he really is hopeless
Sanders wrecks Wilder and probably early on. Wilder is notoriously inaccurate with his punches; Sanders is particularly accurate especially with his left straight. Wilder telegraphs his best punch, whereas Sanders typically fires it off in combination. Wilder has a limited arsenal; Sanders goes well to the head and body and with both hands. Wilder starts slow, Sanders starts fast. Wilder has no footwork, Sanders does. Wilder has no defence; Sanders was not that easy to land on in his prime. I could go on. As for the guys that go on about Wilder having more KOs than Sanders, well there's a reason for that. 1) Wilder hits harder with his best punch than Sanders. 2) Sanders was really more of a boxer that could punch. He was quite happy outpointing guys. 3) Wilder's opposition has been cherrypicked for the oldest, weakest chinned bums that money can buy. His best result, a draw vs Fury, was really a loss and everybody knows it.
Sanders had faster hands and feet than Wilder. Sanders might bumrush him if Wilder couldn't time him from the start.
50-50 bout. The problem with gauging Sanders is he really didn't become a proven heavyweight until he beat Wlad - and, even then, he didn't consolidated that proof. By the time he'd done his number on Wlad, Sanders was past his physical prime and more or less a part-time competitor. If we take that to be the best version of Sanders then he has a small window in which to make an impression on Wilder. He might take the opportunity, he might not. But the longer he's in there, the more chance Wilder has to deliver his own bombs.
