Didn`t catch him, Morrison used a lot of movement, Moorer landed more punches on Foreman and paid the price, Stewart went the distance with Foreman too, taking much more punishment than Morrison did v Foreman.
Yes he did and your just a troll who types stuff cos you got nothing better to do. Don't communicate with me
Tommy for 4 rounds is faster , stronger, and more adaptable. Moorer gets starched. On the off chance this goes longer, I see Morrison with the UD more often than not.
Michael moorer by tko ... I doubt tommy could handle a great southpaw heavyweight like moorer ... if he struggled with hipp then he’s in trouble with moorer ..
I wanted to pick Tommy by early ko but the more I think of it the more I wanna pick the draw option lol
I just cannot decide either, two obvious scenarios are so likely that it becomes almost impossible not to sit on the fence for me.
Mike Moorer was ranked in Ring's Annual Top Ten Annual Rankings 8 times, 7 times at number 3 or 4. Tommy broke the Top Ten twice, both times at 9. What do you suppose you newbies know that us oldtimers did know back then as we actually watched these guys fight and train live?
Of course Moorer ranks higher, but how many flush shots can he take from Tommy and vice versa, I can’t decide
So you talk down to people because you watched these guys hit a heavy bag, spar and fight in person? Are the films I am seeing of all those things wrong?
Moorer and Morrison were the same era, apples to apples. No need to argue difference in eras. We can't use this argument for Bentt because he was injured so early in his career and had to call it a day. Now, you can always argue that Baer would have caused the same injury but that is highly suppositional. My logic is ironclad in its consistency.