Micheal Moorer vs Tommy Morrison

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Kamikaze, Apr 14, 2021.



Who takes it?

  1. Tommy

    51.4%
  2. Mike

    48.6%
  3. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Didn`t catch him, Morrison used a lot of movement, Moorer landed more punches on Foreman and paid the price, Stewart went the distance with Foreman too, taking much more punishment than Morrison did v Foreman.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Morrison didn`t have faster hands than Moorer.
     
    Bonecrusher likes this.
  3. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    57,005
    17,354
    Jul 21, 2012
    Yes he did and your just a troll who types stuff cos you got nothing better to do. Don't communicate with me
     
  4. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,219
    1,889
    Jan 2, 2021
    Explain, please.
     
  5. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,219
    1,889
    Jan 2, 2021
    Explain, please.
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  6. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Bye for now! banned Full Member

    4,226
    4,494
    Oct 12, 2020
    :facepalm:
     
    dinovelvet likes this.
  7. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,865
    Nov 10, 2012
    Tommy for 4 rounds is faster , stronger, and more adaptable.

    Moorer gets starched. On the off chance this goes longer, I see Morrison with the UD more often than not.
     
    Last edited: Apr 15, 2021
    Kamikaze likes this.
  8. daverobin

    daverobin Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,403
    512
    Oct 30, 2015
    Michael moorer by tko ... I doubt tommy could handle a great southpaw heavyweight like moorer ... if he struggled with hipp then he’s in trouble with moorer ..
     
    Kamikaze likes this.
  9. Toney F*** U

    Toney F*** U Boxing junkie Full Member

    6,214
    9,529
    Oct 16, 2019
    I wanted to pick Tommy by early ko but the more I think of it the more I wanna pick the draw option lol
     
    Colonel Sanders and Kamikaze like this.
  10. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Bye for now! banned Full Member

    4,226
    4,494
    Oct 12, 2020
    I just cannot decide either, two obvious scenarios are so likely that it becomes almost impossible not to sit on the fence for me.
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,668
    32,409
    Feb 11, 2005
    Mike Moorer was ranked in Ring's Annual Top Ten Annual Rankings 8 times, 7 times at number 3 or 4.

    Tommy broke the Top Ten twice, both times at 9.

    What do you suppose you newbies know that us oldtimers did know back then as we actually watched these guys fight and train live?
     
    Bonecrusher likes this.
  12. Toney F*** U

    Toney F*** U Boxing junkie Full Member

    6,214
    9,529
    Oct 16, 2019
    Of course Moorer ranks higher, but how many flush shots can he take from Tommy and vice versa, I can’t decide
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. Kamikaze

    Kamikaze Bye for now! banned Full Member

    4,226
    4,494
    Oct 12, 2020
    So you talk down to people because you watched these guys hit a heavy bag, spar and fight in person?
    Are the films I am seeing of all those things wrong?
     
    Colonel Sanders likes this.
  14. ideafix12

    ideafix12 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,712
    683
    Jul 30, 2010
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,668
    32,409
    Feb 11, 2005
    Moorer and Morrison were the same era, apples to apples. No need to argue difference in eras.

    We can't use this argument for Bentt because he was injured so early in his career and had to call it a day. Now, you can always argue that Baer would have caused the same injury but that is highly suppositional.

    My logic is ironclad in its consistency.