How would Anthony Joshua, Usyk and Tyson Fury have fared in the 70s?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, May 3, 2021.



  1. boxingspitbucket24

    boxingspitbucket24 Active Member banned Full Member

    959
    2,066
    Jul 10, 2013
    Ali implements the perfect strategy to beat all 3.

    Foreman grills all 3.

    Fraizer smokes AJ and Usyk. Loses UD to Fury.

    Norton loses to AJ and Fury but beats Usyk.

    These modern fighters careers are still unfolding so I reserve the right to modify these hypothetical predictions according to their future performances.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2021
    MarkusFlorez99 likes this.
  2. chico g

    chico g What are you staring at Mr Trump?! hahaha! Full Member

    10,349
    11,141
    Oct 18, 2008
    I really dunno , but all I know is that bodybuilder Joshua probably wouldn't look like a bodybuilder back then . And puny Usyk would probably be even more scrawny, like a 170lb stick insect! These modern day behemoths are just too big for those yesterday guys!
     
  3. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    24,903
    8,527
    May 29, 2007
    Difficult to see any of them as Champions in the 70s
     
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    6`3 and 170lbs?! Lighter than Bob Foster? Why?
     
    chico g likes this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    All three of them would have beaten Leon Spinks, he was smaller than all three of them and had nowhere near the power of AJ.
     
  6. Exubery

    Exubery New Member Full Member

    4
    1
    Dec 21, 2019
    Fury will be fine. Joshua would be top 10 say around 5-6 but not the champ. Usyk could beat the lower guys (Bugner, Wepner, etc.) but struggle against Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Shavers, etc.
     
  7. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,831
    2,114
    Sep 16, 2020
    70 ies?
    Prime 30-33 y.o Usyk I think had beated Norton due to styles and had less torture vs Frazier while Foreman might gave him more problems, if young prime Foreman, I think he might KO Usyk unlike Ali version from 70 ies, this version most likely had lost vs prime Usyk on fair cards even in 2 or 3 fights in row.
    Ali from 60 ies Usyk will not beat.
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Bugner was as good as Shavers.
     
  9. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    24,903
    8,527
    May 29, 2007
    Not sure they would. Leon was a very good fighter.
     
  10. Exubery

    Exubery New Member Full Member

    4
    1
    Dec 21, 2019
    You appear to think very highly of Usyk. Frankly, I do not think he beats some of today's HW let alone from the 70s. Let him fight a couple of decent names and we'll see where he stands.
     
    chico g likes this.
  11. Exubery

    Exubery New Member Full Member

    4
    1
    Dec 21, 2019
    Bugner had agility and movement, Shavers had power. Two different sets of skills.
     
  12. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,831
    2,114
    Sep 16, 2020
    Well, I think for you decent names are only western names.

    For me Ali from 70 ies was worse than prime Huck.
    Nothing decent and nothing notable and definitely NOTHING GOOD.
    Besides his chin and King :p
     
  13. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,831
    2,114
    Sep 16, 2020
    If so, then vs prime Usyk 30-32 y.o versions most likely Bugner;) had more chances to win prime Usyk.
    Shavers despite powerful was too predictable and a bit too slow.
     
  14. Surrix

    Surrix Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,831
    2,114
    Sep 16, 2020
    Prime Usyk had better legs than Ali form 70 ies but worse legs than Ali from 60 ies and he was mobile high guard boxer with modern style.
    Unlike a lot of older decades boxers, he like a lot of modern boxers had more chances vs Norton also not alone cos this, he was excellent in fight with jabs from high guard. Norton had advantages vs a lot of old styles boxers exactly due their guards styles.
    Usyk also is approx 217 lber and this size is larger than a lot of HW division boxers then had.

    Now most likely old Usyk had performed vs Chisora better than young and already enough experienced Parker in 241 lbs who I had assumed that will look better vs Chisora than Usyk exactly due his size and age difference with Usyk.
     
  15. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,282
    16,012
    Jun 25, 2014
    They fought. It didn't go two completed rounds.