Both results were debatable. Remove whyte's headbutt knockdown and it would be closer, but I think Whyte deserved it as he showed he wanted it more, and I felt he did enough in a closer match. Same with Chisora vs Parker, it was close, but I thought Chisora knicked it. Parker just doesn't seem to show enough consistency. He has little in the way of defence, doesn't move his head enough, lowers his guard to invite shots, looks disinterested for periods of time, and his output just doesn't feel there a lot of the time. Parker has serious issues in the way he boxes. He needs to flick his jab more, stop keeping his guard low, and stop going missing for periods of time in the fight.
I could see either Parker or Whyte getting a win against each other. I could see Parker catching Whyte, but Parker leaves himself open with his minimal defence.
Chisora beat Whyte in the first fight and beat Parker on the weekend. Neither were robberies by any means, simply close fights that could have swung either way but for me Chisora edged both.
Exactly. Pov had to give Whyte a rematch with zero controversy in their first fight, Parker should defo get his Whyte rematch. I get the feeling Parker isn’t to fussed about anything though, just goes with the flow
"I think also Chris Arreola might be somebody to look at, because he just acquitted himself well against Adam Kownacki and Andy Ruiz," Whyte told Sky Sports' Toe 2 Toe podcast. "It would be good if I could blow him away in four or five rounds as well, because my name has been matched with Andy Ruiz and those kind of guys. I thought he [Arreola] won the fight with Andy Ruiz, to be honest. I thought he won it by a split decision."