"I HAD SAUNDERS AHEAD!" Do any of the forum users here agree with Buffer? Despite many believing that Saunders was ahead in the fight prior to the stoppage, the three judges did not see it this way. Glenn Feldman and Max DeLuca scored the fight 78-74 for Canelo, while Tim Cheatham had it 77-75, also to Canelo.
I had it 5-3 Canelo after 8 rounds. Bjs did some good things, but he wasnt ready for canelos quick timing and counter punching ability. Canelo made the adjustments he needed and showed why he is the best fighter in the world p4p
Dude can you please stop using fat and big letters? Absolutely annoying. Your useless topics aren't getting more sense with it.
Useless topic? Despite many believing that Saunders was ahead in the fight prior to the stoppage, the three judges did not see it this way. Glenn Feldman and Max DeLuca scored the fight 78-74 for Canelo, while Tim Cheatham had it 77-75, also to Canelo.
I had it 4-4 or 5-3 BJS, and was quite worried for the first boxing bet I've made in a while (which was on canelo to win) because I started to feel like after rounds 2-3 Canelo had kind of run out of ideas or BJS was figuring him out. Canelo was landing harder shots but they were few and far between i felt and from a generalship perspective I felt Saunders was making it the fight he wanted and Canelo was struggling to impose anything. But boxing in subjective everyone looks for different things and I think in terms of damage dealt Canelo in his seldom shots was doing more than BJS as a whole, so I can see 5-3 Canelo, but from my own criteria I had Saunders ahead
I had 6- 2 for BJS Agreed with Mannix and Buffer that BJS was ahead. But Canelo got the win and might of ended BJS career too.