Of course Canelo was juicing back then. Same as Floyd and same as Golovkin. You guys live with your head deep in the sand.
The only guy who’s showing signs of a mental illness, is YOU. You have absolutely embarrassed yourself in this thread. Seriously, everything that you’ve written is cringeworthy, illogical and false. What’s with all of the “barking, begging.....” posts?? Those guys moved up to a division where he was ALREADY a champion, and then he became their MANDATORY challenger. This is the last time I’m going to explain this to you: Cotto had THREE consecutive C-W fights and then went BACK to JMW. Canelo GAVE UP HIS BELT to drop back to JMW, BEFORE then fighting a C-W fight which was ABOVE MW. Neither of those guys would fight Gennady Golovkin. Please try and absorb this information into your brain. I appreciate that’s it’s difficult for you. Canelo had done NOTHING in boxing until he got the OPPORTUNITY to fight a washed up Mosley. He won a VACANT belt and defended it against 2 euro level Brits. But fighting Mosley lead to a fight with Floyd which gave him huge exposure. GG didn’t get those same opportunities and a chance of gaining maximum exposure, because again, the guys who you’re defending, WOULDN’T fight him. You’ve got to be a special kind of STUPID to defend the guys who DUCKED, instead of the guy who wanted to fight them. You’ve got to be the world’s biggest SIMPLETON to trash a guy’s resume, knowing that he couldn’t accumulate a stronger one, because the top fighters who would have strengthened it ran for the hills. You are hating on a guy for having a weak resume, yet you’re defending the guy who literally gave up his belt to avoid fighting him, which would have made it stronger. I’m obviously debating with an absolute genius here.
Scar, This is what you wrote regarding Cotto: The same guy who fought THREE C-W’s before going back to JMW. The same guy who wanted to fight a C-W against Canelo, INSTEAD of facing GG in a UNIFICATION. So: He wouldn’t fight Martinez at the MW limit, he wouldn’t fight Geale at the MW limit, he chose to fight Canelo instead of GG, yet according to you, he didn’t have an issue fighting GG. Ha! He wouldn’t fight GG, yet he had no issues fighting him?? How does that make sense you nut?? Obviously he DID have an issue fighting him, otherwise we’d have seen the fight. Oh but wait: GG didn’t bring anything to the table. (apart from the WBA belt) Yet what exactly did Daniel Geale bring to the table?? I’ll wait. What an absolute fool you are. I despair.
Your logic: GG didn’t deserve a fight with Cotto. He’d done nothing to warrant it. Cotto was right to not fight him. Yet: Cotto fought Geale, AFTER HE’D ALREADY LOST to GG the previous year. Ha! So: GG had done nothing to warrant a fight, but Geale had?? You’re priceless.
Irrelevant when it comes to wining a boxing match. How much did pea whitaker hurt jcc? Yet he still gave him a boxing lesson.
Yes he lost to a smaller opponent he shamelessly begged for a payday. At some point he was also shamelessly calling out Mayweather and Pacquiao to move up to Middleweight and make the long awaited free donation. He honestly can't be blamed for it either, if I had morons like you roaring me on regardless, I'll do the same.
Says the clown that says Cotto, who fought the likes of Concreto x2, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Torres, Cintron, Martinez, Mosley, Clottey...etc, scared of a farce who's biggest win at the time was Rubio.
Yup, and only difference is, Geale was tune-up material for Cotto. For Golovkin though, he was serious progress.
