No, you quite blatantly said that it wasn't comparable. Wasn't that your word, "comparable"? That you were suggesting one was considerably less important or tragic than the other is the logical inference, and one that was made by more than just yours truly. If you don't understand that is how it looked then you need to be more precise with your language in future.
I thought my position was pretty clear from the gate. If anything I wrote seemed ambiguous or difficult to comprehend then its ok to say you need more illumination instead of jumping to premature conclusions. I'm perfectly comfortable with us maintaining our positions on the subject. I'm certainly not the one attempting to question your knowledge base of the cascading impact of the transatlanic slave trade pre & post voyage(s). I'd expect a decent person to reciprocate the respect by not trying to fish for a deeper reaction that fits into what you believe Im thinking. So as I stated before they are not comparable in my opinion. You can contrast events and actions in fragments just not wholistically, which is why I say they are not equivalents.
So, you think I didn't understand and needed clarity, then you say that you don't think they are comparable, which is exactly what I said to begin with. You are contradicting yourself multiple times in every comment. Do you even know what you are typing? Stop trying to use words with 5 syllables, and stop this inane nonsense about me not understanding. I am not an imbecile you can impress with pretentious language ripped from someone's thesis. P.S O have no animosity towards you, I just want you to stop engaging with me as if I don't know what's going on. Ultimately, I think conversation has served its purpose and I see no point continuing it.
Let me preface this post by saying I don't think you're an imbecile, that's not even remotely close to my impression of you. Secondly, I don't deliberately try to use five syllable words I just have a small case of obsessive compulsive disorder that gets annoyed with using commonly used words. Lastly I haven't once contradicted myself, I made my point, revealed high level why I feel the way I do and that's about it. I'm not sure how this conversation served its purpose; nevertheless, what is obvious here is that we see the world from a different set of goggles....nothing wrong with that.
He's ATG level excuse maker. I have confidence he can pull even more ludicrous excuses out of his ass.
This is the first thing you've said that we agree on. Let's leave it there and drop the other stuff. This is a boxing forum and we can both go to other places if we want to discuss politics and history etc... Thank you for remaining civil.
Wilder will be an absolute mess by the time this fight starts, Fury will leave him a raging mess from the conferences and weigh in etc, Wilder be mentally and physically drained again by the time the bell rings, hes got 2 rounds to go out and win this fight imo, If Fury gets through that and has wilder going backwards again then I think Wilder gets the **** kicked out of him again
Well, I earlier never was really religious guy until one moment in my life. I never was too bad or too good lad. I had counted " Pater Noster " when they had applied hands wraps for fight vs best lad in my life I ever had to fight with when they applied hands wrapping. not fanatic but then I had felt that there is some thing above all ppl here. I'm not so sure there but there is something above all of us here. Some thing here does exist.
You mean after he knocks out Fury he will be so distraught that he will need to check himself into a loony bin?
can the athletic commission stop the fight on grounds that wilder probably has brain damage? do they check?
