Sky sports boxing overrated the heavyweight division? thoughts

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jacob Hall, Jun 21, 2021.



  1. Jacob Hall

    Jacob Hall Member Full Member

    375
    482
    Feb 5, 2018
    back when joshua won the title the skysports hype train went into overdrive i heard adam smith saying how its a golden generation of heavyweights like the 70s or 90s and i was like wtf are they on about? what do you guys think of the heavyweight division the last 5-6 years?
     
  2. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    24,903
    8,527
    May 29, 2007
    AJ has done well for Sky and they for him. He alongside Canelo are the face of boxing. Multimillionaires who transcend the sport.
     
  3. Boxing Gloves

    Boxing Gloves Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,169
    1,105
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's not the 70s or 90s but it's certainly a competitive division with talent coming through. Its better than the 80s and the Klitschko era.
     
    Aburius, ShovelHook, Mitch87 and 4 others like this.
  4. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,260
    24,820
    Apr 4, 2005
    I don't think it's a great era. It's a very competitive era which makes it exciting but the fact you've got Chisora from the last era giving some of top 10 guys like Whyte and Parker very tough fights and a close to shot Povetkin KOing one of the top contenders suggests this era is no better than the last one, only you don't have the Klitschko's dominating like before.

    Fury is probably the stand out heavyweight in terms of ability but he's never really shown he could dominate. After he beat Wlad he was inactive and while the win over Wilder was impressive he's done little else. AJ is the most ambitious of the top guys, he's the one whose really chased a defining legacy but he's too vulnerable and then everyone else just has too many flaws and there's not really much separating the rest of the top 10.

    This era not only lacks a stand out heavyweight potentially dominant heavyweight but it lacks depth. Maybe Fury and AJ could go on to carve out careers that could be seen as great but I don't see anyone else who currently has that potential. Usyk even if he beats AJ isn't young, he won't be on top for long, Whyte already has 2 losses vs top guys, Wilder was always a paper champion, Joyce is too old to have a lengthy reign, Parker has stagnated over the last few years and doesn't look like he's every going to do anymore than he has already done.

    Compare that to 70's Ali, Foreman, Frazier, Holmes or 90's Lewis, Holyfield, Tyson, Bowe and it's clear this era isn't close to being as good as those era's.
     
  5. ertwin

    ertwin Active Member Full Member

    1,330
    1,070
    Aug 2, 2016
    Of course its a golden era for the brits cause the vast majority of good hws are brits. The americans do exactly the same. Your own dik tends to taste the best to most people.
     
    gmurphy, ShovelHook and JunlongXiFan like this.
  6. ipitythefool

    ipitythefool Prediction ? Pain Full Member

    5,854
    9,925
    Mar 17, 2017
    It's a golden era for British HW boxing

    It's a garbage era for world HW boxing. Based on lack of depth of quality.
     
    N17 and 007 373 5963 like this.
  7. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,123
    807
    Sep 10, 2005
    There's been too many sub-par performances. Too many pounds on some. Too little fire in others.

    Generally speaking, the biggest problem has been one of boxing's biggest problems - too much inactivity.

    Wilder first became champion at the beginning of 2015. Him, Fury and Joshua should have all had their sagas by now.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2021
  8. Safin

    Safin Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,815
    7,768
    Aug 3, 2019
    You're confusing the concept of transcending sport with transcending the marketing and sales management of sport (administration).
     
    gmurphy, mark ant, Sap1en and 2 others like this.
  9. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,901
    18,335
    Nov 27, 2010
    Joshua has come no where near transcending the sport. His intro to the US market was getting hammered by a fat guy. Lol
     
    N17 and gmurphy like this.
  10. TipNom

    TipNom Active Member Full Member

    1,105
    2,228
    Jun 19, 2019
    I think it'll be looked upon more fondly when the era has passed, as most eras tend to be.
     
  11. Olu G. Rotimi

    Olu G. Rotimi The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    24,903
    8,527
    May 29, 2007
    I beg to differ transcending the sport is when people who are not into boxing know of and support the boxer. A good example of this is housewives who don’t care about boxing love Canelo and AJ because they think they are so handsome, nice and polite or those who hated and admired Floyd so much they paid to watch him. Marketing helps to an extent but true charisma is the certain Je Ne Sais Quoi.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2021
    JunlongXiFan likes this.
  12. Slyk

    Slyk Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,816
    2,965
    Dec 5, 2010
    Sky sports is trash. When I happen to land on sky commentary I've noticed they will simply not shut the **** up for one second to watch the action. It's an incessant stream of words that have little, if any, relevance to the action. Hype manning for the in house fighter is standard. Not calling blows landed by the outsider fighter is standard.

    The way boxing is built up in the UK is especially disgusting for some reason. Hyping fighters so often and so early becomes cringeworthy. They hype the opponents of their star. They hype the opponents of the opponents. There's a giant machine that can be switched to "ON" and all of a sudden you've got a super star boxer.

    It's especially annoying to see the effects of the hype machine when a fighter like Josh Taylor, perhaps the most legit fighter out of the UK in the last few decades, gets nothing. UK boxing fans are more interested in watching an interview of Dillian Whyte trash talking Wilder than they are watching Taylor become undisputed.
     
  13. Gatekeeper

    Gatekeeper Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,368
    2,973
    Oct 18, 2009
    It'll be looked back on as a fun and competitive era that was badly needed after the boring wasteland that was the Klitschko era (2005-2015).
    You know people look back on the 90's as a great HW era and in a sense it was but there A LOT of matchups that either never happened or happened too late (Lewis-Bowe, Tyson-Foreman etc.). The 90's were very good but not quite as great as people remember IMO.

    The current era while the talent may not be on the same level as previous eras for fun and entertainment it's not bad at all.
     
    the_Hawk, Aburius, Wizbit1013 and 2 others like this.
  14. JunlongXiFan

    JunlongXiFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,416
    5,816
    Aug 9, 2020
    H2H it’s the GOAT era and there’s more international competition than ever before. I genuinely believe the top 20 now ends up getting at least 13 victories against any top 20 before 1990.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2021
  15. Oddone

    Oddone Bermane Stiverne's life coach. Full Member

    5,015
    10,698
    Aug 18, 2019
    This.
     
    Mitch87, TipNom and Boxing Gloves like this.