Donovan ruddock vs Anthony Joshua ???

"You're logic is atrocious" - coming from somebody who doesn't know the difference between you're and your. Nobody cares about grammar on this forum, but when you call people out for being stupid and unintelligent, you better be able to demonstrate, minimally, an understanding representative of a six year old child. You repeatedly fail at this. Everybody makes typing errors, but you make the same basic errors all of the time that they clearly cease to be as much, all at the same time you put down others.

"You never responded because you had nothing to respond with." - "I won the argument because I responded last". I already said what I had to say on the nature of discussion. You talk a whole lot but say not very much. You're that kind of guy. I bet you cuddle yourself at night.

"This is by far the cringiest thing I've seen today. Is this your attempt at trying to sound like you have more than 2 braincells ? Lmao. Go ahead, debunk it. Since your calling that a bad explanation, even though numerous breakdowns have said similar." - That's like asking someone to debunk the Earth being flat. You're definitely an uneducated guy, but you like to pretend that you're not. You don't even know the difference between "you're" and "your", "lose" and "loose" (being the hypocrite that you are, you didn't respond to that one, when called out, did you?), but you're telling me that you have a basic understanding of biomechanics? You couldn't even define and provide examples by way of analysis of basic concepts like center of mass, inertia, force and velocity.

"This is sad, I've expected better. I debate with people on a daily basis that have more weight in their arguments" - Imagine getting this triggered on a boxing forum.

 

Of course you're going after grammar because the rest of your options are exhausted. It's clear as day. You're incredibly pathetic. I think you actually did this another time when i used loose as lose as a mistake.

"I won the argument because I responded last". Eh no i won because i debunked you. You had no evidence at all of me saying Takam is a good fighter and you certainly had no evidence of me referring to any boxers who have beaten nobody of note as a top 10 to elevate Aj's resume.

I didn't respond because you called out a grammar mistake of all things. Its been clear that when you have nothing else to say you latch on to spelling errors. LOL the fact that we're in the 3rd paragraph of your novel and you're already back on the grammar. Quit wasting my time.

"That's like asking someone to debunk the Earth being flat." False because you can debunk that the earth is flat with calculations and real world observational evidence. Are you this stupid ? Genuine question.

"You couldn't even define and provide examples by way of analysis of basic concepts like center of mass, inertia, force and velocity." Nitpicking. I explained how Ruddock looks for angles and openings before unloading his smash. Why would you need to know those things. Force of what ? Velocity of what ? Why would you need to know the inertia ? inertia of Ruddock ? His punch ? Who cares ? His center of mass slightly shifts when he leans into a punch which is why he slipped once or twice against Tyson but what do you gain with this knowledge when referring to my position on Ruddock ?

The stupidity is endless LOL

 

Wlad, Povetkin, Whyte, Parker, And Takam. Those wins are All better than a past it dokes. Ruddock only has a punchers chance here

 

Yeah I guess whoever lands the big one first

 

AJ will land first fs. He’s taller, has longer reached, and is more skilled.

 

Takam isn't better than a past it Dokes, and Parker couldn't even beat a 37 year old Chisora convincingly. Ruddock also murdered Dokes, it wasn't a hard night. Povetkin and Klitschko are definitely better though. But i agree with you on the fact that Aj is simply just the better fighter and has a better resume. I see no reason to favor Ruddock. But Ruddock in his peak has a decent chin and he's also murderous puncher so you never know.

 

Of course AJ is better, bigger, and has higher level wins, but you know classic. If the old school fighter has any advantage he has to be heavily favored

 

Yeah i can actually see Aj catching him in the middle rounds or wearing him down late. Aj's size will mean Ruddock will try and press the action like he did against Smith and Richardson and he could catch a counter like he did against Smith. But Aj got caught by Ruiz and Ruddock wasn't really a bad fighter despite what everybody says, he actually had a great jab and had devastating power. so I'd say 80/20 favoring Aj

 

I'm leaning a bit toward AJ, but I don't think he could take too many of those hookercuts. If he gets caught flush twice in a row the fight's over.

I wouldn't bet on this one.