Prime Donovan ruddock v Andy Ruiz: who wins??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by daverobin, Aug 10, 2019.



Who wins?

  1. Ruddock

    27 vote(s)
    61.4%
  2. Ruiz

    17 vote(s)
    38.6%
  1. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,258
    24,818
    Apr 4, 2005
    Parker's jab is trash. Yeah it's fast and flashy but it's literally a nothing punch. He has a 76 inch reach, 6 inches shorter than Ruddock's, Ruddock wouldn't even need the jab he could throw the smash or any other shot from a distance and still be outside of Parker's jab.

    There's not enough pop on it and he doesn't know how to use it to control range he simply throws it to set up his other shots. Problem is almost all his attacks start with a jab, his jab if anything is a liability as it signals to his opponent when to go defensive or counter.

    Of all the attributes I'd pick as an argument for Parker his jab isn't one of them it's one of his biggest flaws.
     
    Wizbit1013 and Somali Sanil like this.
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    But Ruddock missed so much, he was just a clumsy slugger.
     
  3. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,544
    Sep 1, 2019
    Tyson still had good movement, not on point but good enough to avoid some heavy power shots. Ruddock would easily be the danger man of the division if around now, no one would be safe. Mark, go and watch more of Ruddock
     
  4. AdamT

    AdamT Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,813
    4,401
    Sep 18, 2019
    Ruddock beats ruiz and Aj back to back
     
  5. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,245
    11,499
    Jan 13, 2021
    Lmao no, Lennox Lewis himself said Ruddock had a good jab, Thats one thing thats underrated about ruddock. Parkers jab is quicker but it has nothing, Parker tries to flick it out or whip it out Larry Holmes style but he's sucks at it
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.
  6. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    No thanks.
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Why would Lewis say Ruddock had a good jab? It wasn`t present in their two round blowout.
     
  8. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    27,361
    11,780
    Dec 6, 2008
    Man, what were you smoking this day?
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Ruddock had no skill what so ever just a good left uppercut, he was a mess in the ring but had a lot of power.
     
  10. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,245
    11,499
    Jan 13, 2021
    Yes it was, watch all of round 1. Lewis was outjabbing him but ruddock jabbed somewhat well for being at a reach disadvantage.
     
  11. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,544
    Sep 1, 2019
    You need to do something mark
     
  12. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,544
    Sep 1, 2019
    Mark needed that ban for his insolence
     
    Tankatron and MarkusFlorez99 like this.
  13. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    12,297
    15,499
    Mar 17, 2018
    What he do this time?

    Guys getting kicked a fair bit lately lol
     
  14. Somali Sanil

    Somali Sanil Wild Buffalo Man banned Full Member

    6,555
    7,544
    Sep 1, 2019
    I don’t know, he changes the topic mid convo though an I wanna tell him to **** off but he’s a good egg really. We’re talking power, he starts talking jabs lol
     
  15. chico g

    chico g What are you staring at Mr Trump?! hahaha! Full Member

    10,349
    11,141
    Oct 18, 2008
    Ruddock would end up like Joshua from the first fight. Too aggressive, and not enough punch resistance, when Mr Blobby fires back.