How good is Wlads win over Brewster

I would say you are the idiot. At no point did Brewster do anything until Wlad's hands dropped. And he still couldn't put his ass on the ground. It is ****ing black and white.

 

And that was on Brewster's onslaught after Wlad shot his load. Damn you are a ****ing homer...

 

Absolute, 100% bull****. WALD got chin-checked and failed.

Unbelievable excuse making, just unbelievable.

 

I watched the fight so many times my VCR broke, Brewster did catch Wlad with a good many body shots early on the fight which caused RJJ to comment on how well Brewster is going to the body early in the fight, which made Merchant make a comment along the lines of " Wlad doesnt have a glass body Roy", also in the 3rd round Lamon hurt Wlad with a jab that made his legs buckle and forced him to clinch Brewster, Ledderman actually gave Brewster that round on his scorecard.

Please people, Brewster did land decent shots before the 5th round, if you dont believe me, watch it on youtube again, he landed some very hard bodyshots and hurt Wlad in the 3rd, even so much so Roy laughed at how Weak Wlad's chin looked after his reaction to the stiff jab.

 

Well if you watch from around the 3 minute mark you'll see WALDO had his hands up defending himself, got caught with a jab, then another jab and then a left-right-left combo - the final punch of that combo WALD had his hand up and tried to block the punch but didn't, and that's the one that did the damage. It's not black and white by the way it's colour :yep

What Brewster did BEFORE this is irrelevent, he stopped WALD with punches. Also Brewster would have floored WALD, no doubt about it - had the referee not given WALD a ****ing standing 8 count. What was that all about?

[yt]d5Lf_wXLPkg[/yt]

 

No, that was after the 3 punch combination that put WALD on ***** st. WALD dropped his hands at that point because he doesn't handle getting hit too well, as we all know.

OK so I'm a homer, whatever that means. You on the other hand are blind to the facts, as is any Klit-ite that still protests that Brewsters win over WALD was due to anything other than punches.

To use the same logic Foreman never beat Moorer because up to that point in the fight he was nothing other than a punching bag and he managed to land a KO blow - how ****ing unfair can you get?

 

He was soft in the first fight. Wlad had his number. Wlad will always have his no. even tho' I respect Brew. Maybe a Wlad/Brew rubber should happen?

 

Yes, it must be a bull**** loss, because the guy that WALD pays wages to says so

This having no class in defeat must be a Klitschko trait, at least WALD didn't prance around the ring waving his arms like VITLAY did against Lewis though I suppose. Having said that his legs probably weren't working well enough to do that.

 

I agree with you, but the poignant thing here is the 5th round. Brewster landed hurtful punches and won, it's that simple. I really can't believe the amount of fanboys that still to this day try to pass this loss off as anything else. I get accused all the time of being a Lewis fanboy yet I've never tried to excuse his losses as anything other than what they were. I've complained about the McCall loss because it was a weak stoppage but that's about it. WALD fans have an excuse for ALL WALDS losses and they even try to reduce the number of knockdowns he's had with bull**** excuses. It's ridiculous.

 

I agree, Wlad's knockdown total stands at 11, and there's a reason why it's that many. Wlads gets hurt way too easy, and when pressured, he usually falls apart at the seams. I'm just happy he could never really be a top 10 ATG Heavyweight no matter how hard he tries, the fact that he fought 3 medicore fighters and was knocked out by the 3, as well as fighting in the worst era for Heavyweights in a long time, definitely hurts his chance of being anywhere near top 10, I think he will finish in the lower end of top 20.

 

What'd Brewster ever do to you?

 

:good Very logical.

 

The thing is I'm not happy about having a heavyweight champion that has lost to 3 mediocre fighters. I can excuse the Purrity loss due to WALDS age, same thing happened with Bruno against Bonecrusher when he got too anxious to knock the guy out.....but at least Bonecrusher eventually became champ I suppose. I'd MUCH rather have a heavyweight champion that was heading for the top 10 than one that is just a gatekeeper and if WALD was that man I'd support him and not give his fans such ****. What irritates me more than anything isn't the over-rating of beating up poor opposition like Thompson and Austin - every champion has to do that...it's the garbage that always follows about how WALD looked great when in fact he looked like what he is, an average champion. The excuse-making for the losses just beggars belief. How the **** can people not see the legitimate punches that Brewster landed on WALD to end that fight? Love is blind I guess.

 

I agree, WALD does have Brewsters number just like Moorer had Foremans number, and Lennox had Rahmans number. **** happens in the heavyweight division and people take hard shots from time to time and lose when they should have won. If only the sack-swingers would just admit it was the punches that did the damage this **** wouldn't still be debated.

 

Yes, the purrity fight was due to him being green thinking he can knock everyone out, but when a guy wasnt going anywhere, Wlad gassed out and Ross took advantage of the situation. The Sanders fight showed how weak Wlad's chin truly is, as well as inability to show mental toughness when the going got tough. His fight against Brewster yet again showed Wlad's lack of toughness, in the face of danger he melted like a ice cream cone from dairy queen.

A true champion prevails when the going gets tough, Holyfield did, Lewis, Holmes, they all had time where the chips were down and they had to dig down deep to pull out a victory, Wlad seems unable to do that. I just hope a real champ, someone who doesnt have a glass chin or a weak pysche, comes and knocks Wlad out for good, the Heavyweight division could use some change.