Tommy Hearns Vs Carl Froch ?

Hearns batters Froch more than those onion rings he bought from the Pub.

 

Froch only fought at 168 pounds.

 

Olu is a barrister lol, not a very good one it would seem

 

Ones frail above his natural fighting weight and the other ones known for his strength and toughness. Froch stops him late

 

Hearns drops froch. Froch returns fire drops Hearns as well only this time he finishes the job

 

If you're implying that since Hearns fought at 175 and cruiser so he batters Froch like onion rings, that's asinine.

 

The battering might be due to Hearns handspeed advantage, better boxing ability, better foot movement, skills and Froch’s porous defence.

 

You are equating Froch with Sugar Ray Leonard! Are you for real?

 

No I'm not equating then. Yes I am real.

 

Froch would KO Hearns and Leonard. Froch wasnt as skilled as they were, but the difference in physical strength and toughness is huge. Froch is just so much stronger and tougher than Hearns.

 

Hearns piston jab keeps slow Carl at bay. Anyone honestly believe Tommy will engage him? As we all know this one takes place at 12, not 15. Tough Carl gets outboxed from distance like Hill did. A Froch Hill thread might be interesting. Not. Hill easy from afar.

 

Hearns. Whats wrong with you people

 

Bull****. Both guys would put Froch in hospital because they hit with more explosive power than Ward and just as skilled.

 

I honestly think Hearns could win this, the natural size difference isn’t as big as you might think and Hearns was skill wise so so much better than Froch, but Froch’s toughness and chin could drag him a late stoppage win

 

Ward is far stronger and tougher than both.