The current undisputed P4P #1 Saul Canelo Alvarez isn't even in your Top 5 lmao. Are all the official P4P lists "corrupt"??? Did Canelo pay off every voter in every P4P list to be #1? How do you explain the fact that he's #1 everywhere? And somehow, according to you, I'm "stupid" for agreeing with all the official P4P lists who have him P4P #1? Don't be a fool, you are the outlier when it comes to Canelo and where he is P4P.
He schooled him early on in the first fight, but GGG made adjustments by the middle rounds to not get schooled as much.
Lol no you're mental. Canelo is not worthy of top p4p 5 and I've addressed that in my post. I addressed your bull**** and you've skipped over it because it's a little too hard for you to spin
Inoue (top in every division he's campaigned at) Canelo (top in 2 of 3 weight divisions he's campaigned at) Usyk (top in 1 division, # 2 in 2nd division, if he beats Fury I'd put him at #1) Spence (top in division he's campaigning at) Taylor (undisputed in single division he's campaigning at) I suppose you could switch Taylor and Spence since both have only one division under their belt. But Spence has more former champs on his resume.
What's so delusional about Shadow having Canelo outboxing GGG in the early part of the fight... He did. How about you watch the fight before calling people delusional. You can easily argue rounds 1-4 for Canelo, and argue round 5 for Canelo. Even if you give GGG 2 of the first 5 rounds, that's 3-2 genius.
Alvarez was the champion at 160, is currently #1 at 168 and one fight away from being the champion there, and was briefly top-3 at 175. He has nearly cleaned out two divisions, while Inoue has yet to do that in one. Inoue has yet to meet anyone at the p4p level, as well. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate Inoue's skill set and think he may be the best fighter in the world, but there is a lot to be desired in regard to his resume. I am glad to see Crawford losing traction because of lackluster CV. I have only seen one person put him #1 here.
1. I do have an admitted bias against nearly all fighters under a certain weight class. (I personally didn't hold Inoue in that high regard until I crash coursed him a while ago and couldn't dispute how great he actually is) 2. Those two one division champions as I've stated are considered at large as "the man" in their divisions by pundits and most of their peers. Is Ioka? (not being facetious serious question) He didn't clean out MW, although he is well on his way to cleaning out SMW though and he get's credit for that. I'll begrudgingly say Champ at MW, because it's official, but let's be honest, he could've lost to Golovkin (who I'm not a fan of) twice (hence me sayin "top").
