I for one appreciate it when the superior fighter holds the titles. Probably depends on the point of view whether it's bad. I guess any delay to an undisputed title fight aint great but at least when and if it happens, it will be a more appropriate match up in regard to toughness and skillset.
I would be quiet too if I had spouted this borderline-xenophobic garbage just a couple of months ago, about the very guy who just pissed all over my biggest future payday: This content is protected I mean, I'd look pretty damn stupid right now wouldn't I?
What is there to say. He just lost one of the largest payday he could have made. Probably kicking himself for not making the fight happen.
Yep Tyson probably still has his mouth open in disbelieve at the thought of 40 million quid going up the swanny. I'd be ****ing crying my eyes out truth be told.
Usyk win is bad for boxing? WTF is wrong with you people. He is the only one making all the fights. If all you want to do is argue about hypothetical fights that never happen, yes, but if you are a boxing aficionado, no. Fury, Wilder, and AJ have been circling for years without fighting. Fury was absent for how long? Wilder's bum train is how long? AJ has at least tried to make some fights, but I am guessing that he has been pricing himself out of fights with Fury and Wilder. If you think Usyk winning is bad for boxing, focus on the Paul brothers and Canelo fights.