How good is this heavyweight era

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Sep 27, 2021.


How good do you think it is ?

Poll closed Jun 23, 2024.
  1. Best heavyweight era of all time

    8.3%
  2. As good as the 90s

    5.6%
  3. Good but not as stacked as the 90s

    25.0%
  4. It's okay

    47.2%
  5. It's terrible

    13.9%
  1. MarkusFlorez99

    MarkusFlorez99 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,132
    19,086
    Jan 13, 2021
  2. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    13,188
    20,571
    Jul 2, 2006
    Good but not as stacked as the 90's

    Certainly the best era i have seen since the 90's

    The Klit brothers took all the excitement out of boxing, especially Wladamir with his endless clinching and leaning, and the referees somehow pretending that leaning and pushing your opponents excessively is ok.

    The Brits (Fury and Joshua) and the Eastern Europeans have breathed life back into boxing.

    Its not a outstanding era yet because you have guys like Parker still in the top 10.

    However, with up and coming guys like Hrgovic and Jalalov, Fury, Usyk, Joshua, Joyce, Ruiz (wish he lost 50 pounds), and even Wilder (not a good boxer but certainly makes game exciting with his power), its a very good era.

    Not as good as the 90's though. The early 90's had Holyfield, Lewis, Bowe, Moorer, Ruddock, old Foreman, Mercer, Morrison and 2 years of Tyson.

    Mid to late 90's had Lewis, older Holyfield, Tua, Ibeaubuchi, up and coming Byrd, Briggs etc.

    There is a huge difference in the 90's when you compare the first half of the decade (90-95) to the last 4 years. The first 6 years were much better in terms of quality of fighters.

    Perhaps the current era is comparable to the late 90's but the early to mid 90's were significantly bigger.
     
    gollumsluvslave likes this.
  3. HellSpawn86

    HellSpawn86 "My heart goes out to you!" Full Member

    21,264
    28,692
    May 6, 2007
    Okay. The top guys aren't fighting each other consistently enough.
     
  4. recycling

    recycling Active Member Full Member

    588
    54
    Sep 18, 2012
    heavyweights have always been low skilled. i can even see previous hw eras having more skill then this one tbh
     
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,029
    86,875
    Aug 21, 2012
    Between okay and terrible.
     
  6. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,429
    42,287
    Jul 4, 2014
    Its OK. The talent is there, but the problems are:

    1) Multiple champs mean guys don't fight each other.
    2) Covid means guys don't fight each other.
    3) Meaningless mandatory status (Whyte!) mean guys don't fight each other
    4) "Wrong guy won" rematch clauses mean the same guys fight each other
    5) Screwjobs mean good fighters don't progress to fight each other
    6) Promoters keep retreading their own guys, even after multiple losses, meaning young guys don't get a chance to fight each other.

    A lot of these problems will be with us until some of these organizations go out of business, but for Christ's sake, let's phase out Parker, Chisora, Ortiz, Pulev, Arreola, maybe Whyte and Ruiz after their next losses, and give the following fighters a chance:

    Gassiev
    Wallin
    Hunter
    Hrgovic
    Yoko
    Sirenko
    Ajagba
    Sanchez
    Jalalov
    Mahkmudov
    Anderson
    Kossibuyskiy
    Dychko (best y'all forgot he existed)
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2021
  7. senpai

    senpai Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,188
    6,891
    May 18, 2021
    It's okay but I think many fighters don't have opportunities to show their skills and power at the highest level. Like Hrgovic, Makhmudov, Dychko

    It would be fun to have WBSS in HW division.

    This content is protected
     
    destruction likes this.
  8. UniversalPart

    UniversalPart Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,948
    12,311
    Jul 1, 2010
    It's well marketed but in an era of internet and social media dominance you would expect that.
     
    UmarIFLUmar likes this.
  9. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,410
    29,754
    Apr 4, 2005
    At best it's OK leaning towards terrible.

    It's a more exciting era than the last one as we don't have such an utterly dominant champion who was head and shoulder above everyone else, so we have more competitive fights. Also the emergence of a real cash cow who's been able to appeal outside of the hardcore fan base and bringing more attention to the division is a positive.

    But there are clearly issues with this era. The top guy in Fury was suspended for 2 years and fought rarely and been tied to a pointless 3 fights with Wilder despite winning the first 2 fights in everyone's eyes. Wilder too has been an awful addition to the division, holding the WBC title, avoiding tough fights, not being made to face mandatories.

    The further proliferation of titles hasn't helped either it was bad enough when there was 3 and then 4 major titles now the WBA alone have 3 world champions with their super, regular, interim BS.

    As for the quality, we clearly have 2 top heavies in Fury and Usyk right now. But thing is Fury rarely fights and Usyk has only had a few fights at heavyweight and probably only has a couple of years left in him as he's already 34, nearly 35. The next top 2 in AJ and Wilder we're late starters and this shows, especially with Wilder. But they despite this have been able to rise to near the top, it's like Michael Grant becoming a long time title holder during his time. A lot of talent that used to go to heavyweight is going to other sports I suspect and so the quality has suffered.
     
  10. Mighty

    Mighty The Gypsy King banned Full Member

    793
    734
    Sep 17, 2021
    It's terrible because of bodybuilder and street fighter. These two blacks ruined the division.

    It's also very good thanks to Fury and Usyk. These two are highly skilled, talented and naturally funny guys.