Roldan vs. Tony Ayala Jr.

not exactly the best of analysts are you?

 

Who's Red?

If there were something to the claim, others would have joined in but I dont see others bringing up this name. You are the only one doing it

and why do it when you
1) arent winning over the others
2) aren't bothering me any
3) making a fool of yourself

and why is Tony not up t the level of Mugabi? You seem to be selling him short.

and not only you, but others

How do you know he wouldnt have turned out at least a strong contender or even champion?

maybe not Hearns but flat footed, overweight, uninspired 31 year old Duran, experience only goes so far when compared to the yough and fire of Tony. it surely was reprieve to Duran that Tony went to a cell but I give Duran credit, he'd fight anyone

I think he could take out Moore or even the light punching McCallum with his kamikaze attack. and he had the power to break his opponent. ask Pipino Cuevas

 

i dont think Duran would have beaten Tony. Even Tony's substitute, laing beat him, remember?

As I said before, you're a poor judge of talent without analytical abilities, making foolish accusations he cant prove

If you know it doesnt bother me, why do you persist in doing it?

 

I have seen the tape of Ramos v Roldan. I give Tony a realistic chance