When it comes to Spence Vs Crawford, I'm undecided. I really don't know who's number one at WW.

Over the past few days, I've watched pretty much all of Crawford and Spence's fights, and my conclusion is pretty much 50/50. Here's the thing, both are great but both are extremely flawed.

Crawford

Pros:

• Great switch hitter; Outside of Ennis and Ward in the past), I can't name a boxer whose a better switch hitter than Crawford.
• Great counter puncher (at least top 3, Canelo, Ennis, and Maybe Usky have an argument over him): Crawford is a great counter-puncher. Outside of Canelo and Maybe Jermall, I can't name a better counter puncher.
• Top 3 finisher outside of Canelo and GGG: When Crawford has you hurt, you're pretty much finished.
• Decent Jab: What can I say more.
• Great at making adjustments. It takes a few rounds, but once Crawford has the adjustments down pact, you're ****ed. Expect to get countered the rest of the night.
• Timing is exceptional: I can't say anything less.

Cons:

• Leaky defense: Crawford gets way too much. When he switches Southpaw, it is fairly easy to counter him (See Gamboa, Mean Machine, and Porter)
• Doesn't seem to handle pressure very well: I had Porter up until the knockdown. Crawford and Porter showed me that Crawford isn't a great defensive fight, and if you pressure him, you can break him down and make it uncomfortable.
• Has not faced a true puncher since Gamboa: His chin is questionable. Gamboa and Mean Machine showed us that his chin is not that strong. Since the Gamboa fight, he has not faced a puncher. I truly believe if he faces a puncher like Ennis, Ortiz Jr, or Spence, he could get hurt and finish pretty fast.
• Competition: His resume is pretty lackluster for a P4P great. I honestly don't know how he would do against Spence, Ortiz Jr. Prime Kell Brook, Prime Keith Thurman, or even Ennis. I have yet to see Crawford is a 50/50 fight. Every fight he has been in, he has been the favorite.

Spence

Pros:

• Best Jab At WW: Outside of Ortiz Jr, I honestly think Spence has the best Jab. He does a tremendous job setting up his shots with the jab.
• Cutting off the ring: Outside of GGG, Spence does the best job of cutting off the ring.
• Inside Fighting: Best inside fighter in the game. Spence does a tremendous job going to the job and making his opponent fight his fight.
• Adjustments. As mentioned before, Spence does a tremendous job making fighters fight his fight (see Porter, Brook, and Garcia). To beat Spence you have to fight him, there's no way around it.

Cons:

• Can be outboxed: Someone with tremendous movement and size can outbox Apence. He is a straightforward fighter and is there to be hit.
• Leaky Defense/Lacks head movement: A great counterpunch could counter Spence all night. This is why I favor Ennis t beat Spence.

As you can see, both Spence and Crawford are tremendous fighters but they are far from perfect. With the ascension of Ennis and Ortiz Jr, I am unsure if Spence and Crawford are truly the best in the division. Crawford/Ortiz Jr is a 50/50 fight, as Spence/Ennis is 50/50. I have yet to see Crawford in the ring with a puncher (Ortiz Jr is arguably the hardest puncher at WW), and I have yet to see Spence in the ring with a skilled boxer-puncher(Ennis is just as strong, more technical/skilled, hits just as hard, better foot.work/ movement, better defense, and better counterpunch).

Just thinking about it, I honestly don't know who will win in a potential matchup between Spence and Crawford. Spence has yet to fight someone with the counterpunching and movement of Crawford, yet Crawford has yet to fight a Puncher and pressure fighter like Spence who also has a decent jab.

And to be honest, I don't know if either one is the the best WW in the division. I believe Ortiz Jr and Ennis would be 50/50 against either one. Thoughts??