Michael spinks vs Jersey Joe Walcott

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mr. magoo, Mar 21, 2021.


  1. Gazelle Punch

    Gazelle Punch Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,474
    9,290
    Aug 15, 2018
    Obviously have him top ten but hold men like
    Ali
    Louis
    Lewis
    Foreman
    Marciano
    Liston
    Those I have above him always and men like
    Frazier Tyson and Holmes compete for that 6-9 spot. I think most had Holmes in that territory for a long time until very recently. Any fighter that would normally place in the top ten has an argument for top five. Think the top two slots are filled 2-8 is debatable.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,110
    27,478
    Jan 3, 2007
    You too
     
  3. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,467
    28,995
    Jun 26, 2009
    Hard one for me to call because Spinks has a thin (but impressive) resume at heavyweight and Walcott’s ‘prime’ really boils down to a couple of fights.

    I’l step out on a limb and say Michael jabs his way to a decision with his awkward, herky-jerky style — not an exciting fight to watch regardless.
     
  4. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,405
    2,969
    Oct 18, 2004
    Walcott wins on a split decision, each had a style that could be possible problems for the other, but Jersey had enough to pull it out.
     
  5. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,463
    2,821
    Aug 26, 2011
    Let me ask you, was that Holmes a top 5 HW of all time?

    Could we also say Rocky had a win over a top 1 or 2 HW ever in Louis?

    We could, but that would be disingenuous. Louis career rating is vastly different than his rating against Marciano.

    The Holmes that fought Spinks wasn't top 5 or even 15 for my money.
     
  6. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,678
    46,502
    Mar 3, 2019
    It's a different situation. Holmes went on to win at world level years after he lost to Spinks. He's the only person who beat a near prime Larry Holmes. Nobody else can say that.

    Regardless of whether was a top five, fifteen to two hundred heavyweight, he was the number one fighter in the world and an all-time great somewhat near his prime and far bigger. It's an all-time great win.
     
    Rubber Glove Sandwich likes this.
  7. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,463
    2,821
    Aug 26, 2011
    I agree with almost everything you said, but that doesn't change the fact that Spinks didn't beat a prime Homes. He wasn't prime, imo took Spinks too lightly, was overconfident, and the pressure of the Number likely got to him. Yes, it's a great win, yes he took the belt from the champion, but it doesn't factor in nearly as much from a h2h perspective. I thought Holmes won the rematch, which again illustrates the point of Holmes being more focused that time around. It factors in very well from an overall resume perspective, a LHW moving up to HW and beating the champion, a great champion; but we saw others before Spinks show that Holmes might possibly there for the taking soon. It seems you agree Holmes wasn't a top 5 hw of all time that night, which was my only point really, so I guess we agree.