Not sure i have posted this years ago or not. It will be fresh to most and hopefully almost all. I'll be expanding in another thread with a boatload of lists from other notables. Year was 1986 when serious talk was taking place about exactly where Hagler belonged across the decades. Surprising how highly he rates Cerdan but a few others in the next installment seem to be quite big on him as well. I believe this list is H2H based. 1. Sugar Ray Robinson 2. Carlos Monzon 3. Marcel Cerdan 4. Marvin Hagler EDDIE FUTCH, boxing trainer: “You certainly have to put Hagler in the top five. I’ll call it Robinson, Monzon and Cerdan, in that order, so put Hagler fourth. Monzon was a great champion. I had a good kid named Tony Licata who I thought had a boxer’s chance against Monzon in 1975. But he just wasn’t strong enough to keep Monzon off him. Monzon showed me a lot that night.”
I remember the title defense against Tony Licata on June 30 1975 in Madison Square Garden, Monzon by TKO 10.
Yeah, Cerdan definitely seems out of place in that list. No argument with the other three names, of course. No mention of Greb either, though I'm not particularly surprised by his omission. By 1986 it was clear that Hagler could have hung with the best from any era in middleweight history. Do you know if this was before or after the Mugabi fight, John?
Indeed Rich. Futch called Monzon one of he great right hand punchers and said they'd be looking to stay away from it. Futch trained Licata which doesn't come up much.
It's dated 12am day of he fight. So right before the fight. With Greb i believe the concept is H2H and Futch wouldn't rate a guy he hasn't seen. It was mentioned Greb and Ketchel got little support but barely anyone at that time would have seen them fight. Bert Sugar (of course) rated him and another rated him on speculation per conversations and seeing Walker. I'll put it up tonight my time as there are a lot of interesting and controversial takes. We all love a bit of that
1. There’s a thread on here somewhere in the archives about exactly when and how Greb began to be rated so highly because if you go back far enough you rarely see him mentioned. And not just because there’s no film of him because before YouTube most people didn’t know who there was or wasn’t film of and didn’t see most of the film that was out there — not like they showed old B&W (or even color) fight films on TV. He just for some reason wasn’t as regarded as a lot of other guys. 2. (Not speaking directly to @JohnThomas1 here but to the thread in general) Cerdan is easy to overlook because he lost to LaMotta but he fought one-handed most of the way due to an injury sustained when LaMotta threw/wrestled him to the canvas. I think Cerdan would have been favored in the rematch had he not died in a place crash — and if that was the case he’d be discussed in the upper echelon of 160-pounders. 3. Not to do with middleweights, but Eddie saw a LOT of boxing history with his own eyes. I remember distinctly in the lead-up to Tyson-Spinks that he said Tyson had the fastest hands of any heavyweight he’d seen since Joe Louis — yet people don’t often credit Louis with having faster hands than Ali or Patterson. I’ll trust Eddie’s judgment on that.
I think i remember that thread Pat. Perhaps Cerdan has gone another circle and is becoming underrated. I've always championed Joe's handspeed as Ed Schuyler harped on about it decades ago and he sure knows his stuff.
It's a good list. Obviously Futch knows what he speaks of. Cerdan is underrated on this forum, and SRR as a middleweight has been underrated on this forum at times too.
Very interesting I rate Futch at the top as a trainer.Cerdan being there is a huge surprise to me. No Greb,Walker,Ketchel, Steele? Was Eddie perhaps only rating those he had seen himself?
I think he's just rating world champions. I would expect Burley or HWilliams to be high on his list if including the guys without title.