Were Rahman, Peter, and Stiverne superheavyweights?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Jan 16, 2022.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Do you consider Hasim Rahman, Bermane Stiverne, or Samuel Peter to be superheavyweights?

    If not, how much of an advantage do you consider their 240+ pound weights to be over a 1950s sized fighter? (For example: Walcott, Marciano, Charles, Patterson, Ingo.)

    Does being 240+ not mean as much for Stiverne, Rahman, and Peter as it did for Vitali, Wlad, and Fury? Why or why not?
     
    Journeyman92, Charles White and BCS8 like this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,863
    51,983
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't find the term "super-heavyweight" particularly helpful and it's pretty obvious that even moving forwards it is going to mean something slightly different. Or maybe not.

    But either way, I like the term "prohibitively big" :lol:

    We all know that there are fighters that will be prohibitively big for former HW contender Mickey Walker. That is, fighters where size has become such a significant advantage that it begins to dwarf certain others, and that lesser fighters - for example Sam Peter - can be expected to overcome legitimate quill ATG based upon their size annulling all his other advantages.

    Super-heavyweight is not a class, and its use as a term here always relates to the supposed inevitability of 1950s fighters, as you say, to beat modern-day heavies. But it doesn't matter in some instances.
     
  3. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think that's pretty much all correct. The question then is, do we consider shorter, tankier 240+ fighters like Peter/Rahman/Stiverne to be "prohibitively big" against Walker to a similar degree as Vitali/Wlad/Fury would be? Or is there a large gulf between being a short mass of muscle and a really tall, big-framed, but not-refrigerator-shaped man?
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,764
    87,777
    Aug 21, 2012
    i'd say 240lb is a good point to start differentiating super sized heavies from your regular 200-220lb guys. It's a point where you can start to say that the sheer extra weight makes them harder to deal with for the smaller guys. They hit harder and take a shot better. These guys were your 'square' variety of SHW and certainly they pose a different challenge than a proportioned SHW like Wlad etc. I think the 'square type' that excel in slugging it out would be a special challenge for old style heavies around 185-200lb that liked to slug. Guys like Peter and Rahman could really hit hard and when you are exchanging haymakers it is unarguable that 50lb extra would help a lot. A smaller heavyweight that is a defensive cutie might actually be ok against SHW square heavies, because he's not be looking to KO them in the first place and could maximise his evasiveness.
     
    Ali Holmes and cross_trainer like this.
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    66,764
    87,777
    Aug 21, 2012
    Also kudos to cross_trainer for the best threads in a while. So much better than the 50th iteration of Ali vs Marciano
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,863
    51,983
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yes, 245lbs versus walker, as long as it's functional (Andy Ruiz probably your best bet to avoid Stiverne/Peter related arguments about that) is prohibitive in a proven HW regardless of height.

    Obviously if a guy has an egg-shell jaw, or literally can't counter-punch, it won't matter.
     
    BCS8 and cross_trainer like this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,427
    40,603
    Jan 8, 2017
    They make look super heavy, but were they actually super.. Heavy????
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,257
    27,798
    Jan 3, 2007
    I suppose the term “ super heavyweight “ is a grey area since it really has no set standards. For me I guess I consider a super heavyweight as starting with a height of about 6’5” and weight of perhaps 235
     
  9. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    1,227
    Mar 25, 2021
    Not really as much as we'd think, Rahman in most of his big name fights weighed anywhere between 234-238, he weighed 245 against Corrie Sanders.
     
    Fergy likes this.
  10. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    1,227
    Mar 25, 2021
    Rahman barely ever weighed over 238, most of his big fights he weighed 234-238 like in his fights with Lewis, Maskaev, Toney, Tua etc he did way 245 against Corrie Sanders. He looks a lot heavier than he is.
     
  11. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    1,227
    Mar 25, 2021
    It's quite interesting to see what boxing fans consider a "Super heavyweight" And how people's bodies look at similar weights. For example here is former UFC World Heavyweight Champion Stipe Miocic who in these pictures weighed 246 pounds and in the second picture 242 pounds at 6'3-6'4. Realistically no one would think he was heavier on average than Rahman but he was. I believe Wladimir Klitschko was never over 250 pounds either and Wladimir is 6'5-6'6.

    Stipe Miocic at 246 pounds in the first fight against Francis Ngannou

    This content is protected


    Stipe Miocic at 242 pounds in the first fight against Daniel Cormier

    This content is protected


    Wladimir at 240 pounds against Anthony Joshua:

    This content is protected
     
    fists of fury likes this.
  12. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    792
    Aug 17, 2015
    Wladimir is clearly carrying the weight better though. Wlad is at 10% bodyfat, Stipe at 15%. approx
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  13. Moggy94

    Moggy94 Active Member Full Member

    1,165
    1,227
    Mar 25, 2021
    True, it's just an interesting look at height/weight, for example Francis Ngannou would have at least 15 pounds on a prime Wladimir Klitschko and at times 20 at 6'4. Wladimir Klitschko's physique is very underrated to be honest, he's still in amazing shape now.

    Oh yeah what might make the difference too is that Wladimir does actually have skinny legs for his size.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  14. Ali Holmes

    Ali Holmes Active Member banned Full Member

    582
    524
    Dec 23, 2021
    Depends on the fighters. A guy like Lennox Lewis, his size plus his skill make him very difficult for a fighter under 200 pounds to beat. Mike Tyson is another fighter that would be hell on any fighter under 200 pounds. And before you mention Holyfield, Holyfield was 218 pounds of muscle the night he beat Tyson.

    And you have instances where size will just trump skill. Floyd Mayweather is a pound for pound better fighter than Trevor Berbick. But in the ring would have little chance of beating Berbick and Berbick landing punches on a lightweight turned welterweight would probably make Berbick look like a monster puncher.

    On the other hand you have fighters like Floyd Patterson who I would pick to beat Berbick, even though Berbick is the bigger man. Patterson would have enough size coupled with skill to get the job done.
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  15. Ali Holmes

    Ali Holmes Active Member banned Full Member

    582
    524
    Dec 23, 2021
    Ali vs Marciano is a traditional staple of this forum.
     
    cross_trainer and BCS8 like this.