[Deleted by user.]

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, May 27, 2022.


  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,085
    40,045
    Jan 8, 2017
    It's a mixture. One can beat the other, only to lose to one s lost to the guy he's just beat..? :eusa_doh:I think.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,113
    27,490
    Jan 3, 2007
    JohnThomas1 and swagdelfadeel like this.
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,113
    27,490
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yes I’m aware. Norton vs young was not FOR the title.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,975
    27,962
    Feb 15, 2006
    I suppose that Foreman was the best in the world on the day he retired, even though his recent results would not suggest it.

    After that I guess it was Ken Norton, though not in any very clear cut sense.
     
    cross_trainer and swagdelfadeel like this.
  5. joebeadg

    joebeadg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,909
    1,016
    Dec 3, 2005
    I’ll go with jimmy young. I really don’t care much what the judges say when I see what’s going on with my own eyes. But what a group of boxers we had in that time period, young, Norton, shavers, Holmes coming up, Frazier, Lyle, foreman, to name some. Was an exciting time in boxing in all the weight classes. I wish we could have had a few more yrs of those guys fighting each other
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,805
    10,008
    Jul 15, 2008
    Actually solid point on 76 and Foreman ... talk about styles ... I like Norton over Ali, Foreman over Norton and still Ali over Foreman ..
     
    ikrasevic likes this.