Jack Johnson? Under or overrated?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Jun 24, 2022.



  1. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    24,819
    28,291
    Jan 8, 2017
    I've gained a lot of respect for old Jack, in the time I've been on here, learning much about his life and times.

    Whats your view on Johnson, in general.?
    Do you think he gets his due respect on the boards, or is he perhaps over rated in your opinion.?
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  2. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,046
    Oct 28, 2017
    There's valid criticism, but he gets nowhere near enough credit for his pretitle run, him and Tommy Burns really cleared out the division between them, and Johnson beat Burns easily.

    He's a fighter where I think a much broader range of rating is justifiabe than many. There's a lot of ambiguity on how to rate some of his key wins, like Jeffries on his comeback, and a young Sam McVea. I don't think he cleared out an especially strong era, but the decisive nature of a lot of his wins helps his case.

    In terms of footage I think you get a better idea of him watching him when he was past his best against Moran and Willard. In the earlier fights we have on film he was really just toying with overmatched opponents.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2022
    louis54, 70sFan865, Pugguy and 3 others like this.
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    69,970
    23,858
    Feb 15, 2006
    More underrated than overrated today I would say.

    Between his earliest wins over contenders, and his loss to Jess Willard nearly fifteen years later, he had an incredible run of form.

    He also proved himself against every size shape and style of fighter imaginable.
     
  4. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    16,482
    11,167
    Jun 30, 2005
    Once overrated. Now largely rated correctly. Film on Youtube did wonders.
     
    George Crowcroft, Fergy and ron davis like this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    69,970
    23,858
    Feb 15, 2006
    In his case it created a distorted picture.

    The surviving fights showed him beating up on smaller men, when in fact he smashed a lot of big heavyweights.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,010
    38,435
    Mar 21, 2007
    Anyone who has him top two is overrating him, anyone who thinks he is not great is underrating him and anyone who has him anywhere in between has him about right. He mostly gets his due.
     
  7. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,221
    7,558
    Jul 15, 2008
    What does rated correctly mean ?

    Does he look slow when previously we thought he was fast ? NO.
    Does he look weak when we thought he was strong ? NO
    Did he get hit far more often than we thought ? NO
    Did he show poor stamina ? NO

    So it's a matter of styles and a matter of available footage.

    We have three films of a prime Johnson; Burns, Ketchel and Jeffries. Two smaller men and one older man .. he dominated all three men in distance scheduled fights and fought in a distance manner .. he suffers criticism of only fighting smaller men when in reality up to Louis he fought the best big men of any champion . We just don't have it on film but there is a ton of recorded coverage as Pollack's excellent book began to detail.

    My point when rating Johnson is a matter of his style which he used to dominate an era vs his skill set .. his sytyle would have to be modified for a altered sport .. the question is if he had the skill set to translate , his speed, strength, athleticism, stamina, ring IQ were all outstanding .. I see him easily making a transition ...
     
    apollack, Pugguy and Fergy like this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    69,970
    23,858
    Feb 15, 2006
    The best comparison that I can think of, in the post World War II era, is Larry Holmes.

    He was beating the top contenders in droves, over an improbably long period of time, and often dominating them.

    The argument against him, is that he missed some of his most important challengers, or rather fought them at the wrong time.

    He beat Jeffries, Langford, McVea and Jeanette, they just weren't the best versions.

    That is a Mayweather trick.
     
    Fergy and Mark Dunham like this.
  9. Mark Dunham

    Mark Dunham Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,555
    795
    Mar 19, 2021
    that sounds about right
     
    janitor likes this.
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker Full Member

    24,221
    7,558
    Jul 15, 2008
    The versions of Langford, McVey and Jeanette he defeated are very underrated .. they were all more experienced than revisionists make them out to be , they were all kicking some serious butt in thew ring when he fought them .. Langford had over fifty fights as an example .. while they may not have been at their own primes they were legitimate challenges .. post Jeffries, the 32 year old Johnson , past his own prime took the liberty of milking the title ..
     
    Reinhardt, janitor and Pugguy like this.
  11. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 I’m become seeker of milk Full Member

    12,624
    13,276
    Sep 22, 2021
    Bit like Harry Wills. "Fast as a lightweight" :rolleyes:
     
    Fergy and cross_trainer like this.
  12. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,585
    11,046
    Oct 28, 2017
    I think his run of good wins really went from 1903, or maybe 1902, and really ended with the Jeffries win in 1910, after that he defended his title erratically and not against the best opposition. 7 or 8 years is pretty impressive, but I do think he cleared out the division when it was fairly weak, with Jeffries and Fitzsimmons being finished before he fought them, and the Black Triumvirate not yet at their best.


    Langford was a world class fighter, but just not a Heavyweight when Johnson beat him. I don't think it was really much more notable than wins like Frank Childs, Joe Butler, and George Gardner.

    I think the Denver Ed Martin win gets very underrated
     
    Pugguy and Journeyman92 like this.
  13. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 I’m become seeker of milk Full Member

    12,624
    13,276
    Sep 22, 2021
    Random fun facts for you. He argued with anyone who wanted the south east corner of the ring and delayed his fight with McVey for it. He had once put caged rabbits he was given as a pet in his corner for luck and he ran with a gang as a youth, similar to Holyfield his Mum thrashed him when she found out he got beat up and promised to continue to do so till he won.
     
    Fergy and Pugguy like this.
  14. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    24,819
    28,291
    Jan 8, 2017
    I love little nuggets of info about fighter s like that!
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  15. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 Officer Full Member

    36,838
    3,273
    Sep 14, 2005
    ah you judge poor Harry on the footage of him at 37 years old

    let’s pop film of Dempsey at 37. Oh wait there is none