What is these top 10 middleweights had moved up to 168 in May 1992

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Jul 6, 2022.



  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    These are the ring mag ratings in 1992, what if the top 10 middleweights moved up to 168 that year, could any of them have beaten at top 10 168 fighter that year? (Don`t know why Benn`s listed twice). I know Toney moved up anyway but could he have beaten Benn, Eubank or a 168 version of Nunn?
    The Ring magazine in the May 1992 issue.
    Title Vacant 168
    1. Michael Nunn
    2. Iran Barkley
    3. Chris Eubank
    4. Victor Cordoba
    5. Nigel Benn
    6. Nigel Benn
    7. Darrin Van Horn
    8. Lindell Holmes
    9. Tony Thornton
    10. Merqui Sosa
    Title Vacant 160
    1. James Toney
    2. Mike McCallum
    3. Julian Jackson
    4. Sumbu Kalambay
    5. Roy Jones Jr.
    6. Steve Collins
    7. Reggie Johnson
    8. Lamar Parks
    9. Segundo Mercado
    10. Gerald McClellan
     
  2. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,539
    5,511
    Sep 8, 2013
    Almost every middleweight fighter in those rankings was better than the fighters at 168. (Except Segundo Mercado, he pretty much sucked) Any number of them could have moved up and won a title there. And, several did.
     
    Last edited: Jul 6, 2022
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Michael Nunn? Eubank? Benn? Jackson never move up and was better at 154 as was McCallum.
     
  4. Joe.Boxer

    Joe.Boxer Chinchecker Full Member

    7,471
    933
    Jan 8, 2011
    The Ring was just ******ed; the issue date was some time in the future, the ratings were almost recent, and the fight reports were from fights that happened aeons ago.
     
    Bulldog24 likes this.