You think Fury-Chisora III is a real prospect, but I'm clueless? Criminy, I was magnanimous enough to allow your last snark to roll on by and you still have a problem. Do you always cope with opposing views this way?
I've had an eye on these guys for over a decade (fifteen years in Fury's case). I don't think I missed any significant chapters. Let's wait and see. One or the other of us will have to hold his hands up and admit to having gotten it wrong.
I'm aware of it. Doesn't mean a Fury-Chisora III is imminent. Should I be proven wrong, you will see me acknowledge as much and criticize the selection.
****, out of those listed, Miller. We've seen him dismantle Chisora twice, 2 aren't even boxers, one is super retired, one I simply have no desire to see and one lost to someone he just beat. These options are truly sad
You seem to be an okay fellow beneath the casual antagonism, but I believe that your apparent personal distaste for Fury has led you to misread this one. We'll see in the coming weeks/months.
I would like to watch helenius having a shot vs fury. Not that I think he can win, but I'm curious about how he would do. I'm not interested in any of the fights proposed by the OP. In none of them.
Thanks. But I've seen right through Tysons act years ago. He's been backstage with Del many times in his dressing room. He's doing him a favour and taking no risks (typical Tyson).
why are you surprised? this encapsulates Fury's entire career. To answer the question, I wouldn't watch any of them. But I won't watch any ppv's either. That pretty much leaves me watching a handful of fights a year anymore.
Francis Ngannou, but according to MMA rules; in the octagon. Then they would see if Francis Ngannou is a no-hopper.
If Wlad away and Wilder x3 away posed zero "risk" then Fury must be the best ever by a very wide margin. Everyone at the time thought that Wlad, Wilder 1 and Wilder 2 were big-enormous risks, which is why Fury was the underdog in all of those fights.