How good was Mac Foster ?

I'm glad you saw the fight. I'll definitely take your word over ringside reports.

Oh yeah I forgot Ezzard Charles was shot at 32 years old but a 36 year old literally shot Williams is fair game.


Well Ali VS Bonavena didn't go the distance so I don't know why you brought that up but yes Bonavena gave Ali a mudh better fight than Foster.

I'm not "butthurt" nor do I have heroes.

Again, can you point me to where on film, any moments that support your notion that Foster gave Ali a "helluva fight"? [url](82) Muhammad Ali vs Mac Foster 1972-04-01 - YouTube[/url][/QUOTE]
This fight was over in Japan. Afterwards Ali claimed Foster gave him more problems than Frazier did. I read that Foster was very slow and did not hit Ali with more than one punch at a time. Ali won going away and there were no knockdowns although Ali rung Foster's bell with some stinging combos in I believe the 9th round

 

You realise you’re contradicting yourself yet again you nunce.

Also do you have a source for Ali saying Foster gave him more problems than Frazier did?

One of the worst posts I’ve seen on this forum. Absolutely terrible even for your standards. Can’t believe someone actually gave you a like. I thought you were the only clown here but seems like you have company.

 

A lie. I quoted one article in it's entirety including the part where Foster got the KO, and in the other article only included one specific quote, to prove you were lying when you said Foster was never hurt by Williams. The rest of the article was not relevant to the discussion at hand.

Klompton also thinks Williams is impervious to aging, that his shooting didn't affect him, and he'd just lot 60 pounds because of a new diet.

He's quite simply a fanboy, and I don't entertain fanboys.

No idea. I wouldn't bet against it. I know he had partial permanent paralysis and was clearly slower and less powerful at that time..

Please provide your evidence that Charles had Lou Gherig disease at 34. Sounds like you're the one making excuses.

 

You first made a story like Williams was winmer, like he badly hurt Foster but Foster beat him easy.
Now you are trying new things that don't work.
You never quoted the full article because it would not prove your side of the story, like I said and you quoted just some things to make Williams look good which is laughable.

Klompton is just proving that Williams is overrated becausr his fans and Liston fans.
He never beat anyone good as Cooney like I proved, and he was nothing but a contender.
Klompton is just honest guy.

 

Charles was born with that, boxng make it worse and after Marciano fight he showed first signs of that disease.
Again you're making tons of excuses for your fanboy but when someone mention Charles disease or Lyle being stabbed with knife you start going crazy and call me many types of insulting names which is proving that your hyping and simping one overrated fighter is making this Forum very bad.
Klompton just said that and I'm strongly supporting him.

 

I already did and you are doing nothing but insulting which is proving my points.
Your only arguments are: being green,shot,best wins: Miteff and Daniles and you're repeating that like you are having disease not Charles.

 

I found this:
This fight was over in Japan. Afterwards Ali claimed Foster gave him more problems than Frazier did. I read that Foster was very slow and did not hit Ali with more than one punch at a time. Ali won going away and there were no knockdowns although Ali rung Foster's bell with some stinging combos in I believe the 9th round

 

That is why Jerry gets alot of respect as a top contender who would fight anyone.