Bad Bennie Brisco vs Julian Jackson @ MW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Brixton Bomber, Dec 17, 2013.


  1. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,411
    2,976
    Oct 18, 2004
    Bennie wins this in the 11th, in a hard fight.
     
  2. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,034
    13,700
    Oct 20, 2017
    I’m leaning towards Bennie, but Jackson has a puncher’s chance against any middleweight in history, Briscoe included.

    Intriguing match up.
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,061
    49,136
    Apr 27, 2005
    That's where i am sitting.

    TBH i don't think Jackson has a puncher's chance against Hagler. He's one of those rare guys that virtually nullifies the description of puncher's chance. At least we saw a guy like Monzon dropped against Valdez and badly hurt against Briscoe himself but Hagler? He didn't ever show much of anything let alone being hurt or dropped.
     
    Jel likes this.
  4. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    8,034
    13,700
    Oct 20, 2017
    Well, Jackson cracked McCallum pretty well and wobbled him a bit but then Mike went to work and got Jackson out of there in quick time. Hagler might do something similar, like he did with Hearns, even though that wasn’t his usual style.

    But, you’re right, John, if anyone could take a Jackson punch flush and shake it off without a flinch, it would be Marvin. He took plenty of the best Mugabi had to offer and didn’t show any effects (although I think he acknowledged later that he was hurt - can’t find where I saw that, though). But Hagler had as close to a bomb-proof chin as any fighter has ever had.
     
    BEATDOWNZ and JohnThomas1 like this.
  5. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,061
    49,136
    Apr 27, 2005
    Curry also wobbled McCallum as did Toney among others. Of course Mike had superb recuperative powers.

    It would still be a juicy matchup. I do remember Hagler saying he'd been hurt quite a bit in an earlier fight and perhaps it might have been the Monroe loss. I wish i could find it again.
     
    BEATDOWNZ and Jel like this.
  6. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Not a good style match-up for Jackson and so, I think he would have to stop Briscoe to win - earlier, the better.

    As suggested by others, Jackson looked less impressive when forced to fight at mid-to-short range, off the back foot and Briscoe's pressure would likely force this scenario. I also think that, as one-paced as Briscoe could be, it was a pace that wouldn't favor Jackson at all well and I can envisage him being worn down by a fearless, relentless Briscoe and looking quite vulnerable by the mid-to-late stage of the bout.

    And, let's not forget that Briscoe could bang a bit, as well.


    Briscoe W TKO 9
     
    Unnecessarily Hostile likes this.
  7. Unnecessarily Hostile

    Unnecessarily Hostile New Member Full Member

    82
    136
    Nov 20, 2016
    Gonna have to agree with the overwhelming sentiment that a prime Bad Bennie Briscoe, on his finest night, would not be denied by a fighter the caliber of The Hawk, who while great and certainly prolific…was still a mere mortal.

    No, it would take a generational champion with the skill and pedigree of a Hagler, a Greb, a Robinson…or a Monzon to turn Bennie away. And even then…just barely.

    It’s one of the toughest, most unfortunate breaks that comes to my mind when I think of a fighter who really had the goods. I mean a guy that was the real deal. He walked the walk. But for whatever reason…he never could get his hands on that elusive title.