Rate Corbett's Boxing Skills

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Melankomas, Feb 8, 2023.


  1. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    7,172
    8,871
    Dec 18, 2022
    I see a lot of varying opinions about the skills of Gentleman Jim, so I thought I'd start a thread about it. Many people seem to think he was overrated or outdated. Others, like Gene Tunney, celebrated Corbett as one of the greatest tacticians in boxing history. What do you think? How good were Corbett's skills?
     
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    61,087
    81,559
    Aug 21, 2012
    What I've seen on film of him ... he sucks. But on the other hand I think Tunney is a top shelf operator and maybe he saw stuff we didn't.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,175
    48,434
    Mar 21, 2007
    He was one of the very best boxers of his era.
     
    Shay Sonya and Tockah like this.
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,227
    Mar 22, 2015
    I can remember when I first started reading the Ring Magazine as a kid in the early sixties Corbett seemed to be revered.
    Now though well on here anyway he seems to be dismissed.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,801
    29,236
    Jun 2, 2006
    Tunney sparred pit a pat briefly with an in his 60's Corbett,asked afterwards if he learned anything he said ,"I learned plenty",thats rather different than naming him as,"one of the greatest technicians in boxing history!"
    What was Tunney going to say," his style is so outmoded now?"

    Gene Tunney & James J Corbett Sparring Film, New York 1925 - YouTube
     
  6. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT banned Full Member

    17,860
    28,877
    Aug 22, 2021
    In my mind, given that we have some footage of his fight vs Fitz, at least we can see the differences between the "theatrical" version of Corbett (vs Courtney, McCoy and Tunney) and the actual "fighting" version of Corbett (vs Fitz).

    As compared to the other footage. I would say Corbett looks quite a bit better in there against Fitz, and, for his time, he performs some pretty decent moves. It also seems that he could hit harder than he is generally given credit for.

    As far as I can glean from the old footage, though well inactive, he was pretty much having it his way against Fitz until he began to clearly tire after the 6th round - the round in which I think he had Fitz down and then tried his utmost to put Fitz completely out.

    In the context of his times, I think he warranted being viewed as a leading "scientific" boxer. And a good start to being "scientific" back in the day was to actually try and avoid being hit, rather than going punch for punch - the latter approach being viewed as somewhat of a badge of honor as opposed to, God forbid, actually trying to hit without being hit.