This content is protected Fantastic interview with Ingle who knows boxing better than anyone here. He is so knowledgeable this guy. - Fury didn't duck Usyk - Usyk is a better boxer than Joshua - When Joshua became a belt holder there wasn't much competition - When Joshua beat Klitschko, he was on the way out and Fury had already beat him - Joshua "got exposed" by a "little fat Mexican" - Started getting a lot more difficult for Joshua when better fighters started coming through - "a good boxer will always beat Anthony Joshua" - "Joshua started getting wins because he was carefully promoted by Eddie Hearn" - "Rob McCracken was looking at the opposition and picking the easiest route through for you" - says he knew Ruiz would "lose the plot" for rematch vs Joshua and not knuckle down - "he's the fat man who's won the fight, he's got all this money and adulation, he's going to lose the plot and he's not going to turn up the second time"
Safin should really ease off from this forum. It must be horrendous on the aul mental 'elf to keep this up. Tony Bellew > Tiresome Fury.
Well according to the forum the other week on Dominic ingle thread hes a man who speaks sense and is always worth listening to but then again on that occasion he must have been saying the right stuff eh
Not to mention Ingle is making judgements on being wrongly informed on splits by the interviewer. Ingle thought that Usyk in the rematch was demanding 70-30 if he won the first fight AND the same 70-30 to himself even if he had lost. The interviewer made no mention of what Fury wanted had he won, only that he wanted 50-50 if Usyk won. So, Ingle came to a meaningless* conclusion based on faulty information. He even admitted to not really following what went on. *Edit: actually that is not fair to him. Ingle came to the best conclusion he could based on the faulty information he was given.
Haven't watched the interview just read the notes. So it's basically an interview with Ingle hating on Anthony Joshua? Weirdo.
The interview is a fair reflection of reality but he is wrong about Fury who ducked Usyk. No excuses for failing to grasp the opportunity to make history going down as a real legend holding all 4 belts for the first time in the division beating another undefeated fighter.