What makes a fight classic?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SorceryatCaesar, Aug 4, 2008.


  1. SorceryatCaesar

    SorceryatCaesar Leonard-Hagler author Full Member

    268
    0
    Aug 3, 2008
    Change of momentum? Knockdowns? Pace and intensity? Underdog upset? Technical skill?

    Lots of talk about 'classic' fights, but no clear definition.

    Help me out.
     
  2. juanitoboxing

    juanitoboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,010
    1
    Jul 28, 2008
    I would say pace and intensity in the mix with whats at stake.
     
  3. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    Either a great brawl or a great boxing performance I would think.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,876
    52,022
    Mar 21, 2007
    You can't define it. I know what you mean, but you just can't.

    All i will say is - you know when you are watching one.
     
  5. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    I'd say it's the kind of fight that you can add to yoru library and watch over and over and enjoy it every time.
     
  6. BewareofDawg

    BewareofDawg P4P Champ Full Member

    27,677
    184
    Apr 8, 2006
    This content is protected
     
  7. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    LOL, his face.
     
  8. David_TheMan

    David_TheMan ESB Sage Full Member

    5,908
    2
    Dec 31, 2007
    I think a classic fight has ebbs and flow, tension, and a dramatic conclusion, which doesn't have to be a knockout.
     
  9. SorceryatCaesar

    SorceryatCaesar Leonard-Hagler author Full Member

    268
    0
    Aug 3, 2008

    Good one. That was Chief Justice Douglas' definition of pornography. You know it when you see it.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,876
    52,022
    Mar 21, 2007

    :lol:
     
  11. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    major hype and a good technical brawl
     
  12. rock_lv

    rock_lv Active Member Full Member

    809
    0
    Sep 28, 2007
    I have to say that the fight must have major meaning. What I mean is that I view Morales-Barrera I in higher regard thank Gatti-Ward (although this fight was definitely a classic) because there was more on the line. Which is probably why I'm rating Margarito-Cotto above Vasquez-Marquez III as FOTY. Also, all the things the TS stated are all factors too.
     
  13. Brickhaus

    Brickhaus Packs the house Full Member

    22,296
    6
    Mar 14, 2007
    How was more on the line in Cotto-Margarito than in Marquez-Vasquez? At least in the latter fight, both guys were top 10 P4P, and the fight was for the lineal title and the Ring title (as well as an ABC belt). Cotto-Margarito was just for an ABC belt.
     
  14. sugarngold

    sugarngold RIDDUM Full Member

    18,550
    5
    Jun 10, 2007
    Back and forth action. Unexpected drama and surprises. Displays of studied technique. All of these elements must blend together to make something special.
     
  15. SorceryatCaesar

    SorceryatCaesar Leonard-Hagler author Full Member

    268
    0
    Aug 3, 2008
    i think the fighters have to be in their primes - it's not classic if they're past it.