A deeper dive on Archie Moore's greatness.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Ioakeim Tzortzakis, Sep 10, 2023.


  1. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,578
    5,371
    Aug 27, 2020
    I've had a weird fascination with Archie Moore almost since the moment I had learned about him. No fighter has ever drawn me quite as much as him and piqued my curiosity to that extent, with the exception of Harry Greb. And in both cases it was rooted in the talks surrounding them. For Greb it was his sheer otherwordliness, stuff like going 45-0 in a year, being the only conqueror of Gene Tunney, his lack of footage, his apparently great resume filled with fighters I didn't know about etc. etc. But for the Old Mangoose, it was different. My curiosity of him is rooted mainly in the author Springs Toledo, who was also an active participant of this forum far before I had joined. The intrigue started in his ''How to Beat Floyd Mayweather'' analysis articles, where he recalled Jim Murray characterizing Archie as a Ring Mechanic, a man who has all the tools and the knowledge in his disposal to make any machine, or in this case, opponent, break down. Which lead to me having a very good image of him obviously. But it truly ignited in his ''The Gods of War'' entry. But more on the contents of that entry later. Anyway, enough of this, let's go. And just like the Robinson one, this is really long.

    It is well known that originally, Moore wasn't the fighter he would later become, as was the case with most greats in that era, and even in history to a lesser extent. Not everybody could be Sugar Ray Robinson, beating divisional number 1's within a year of their pro debut, and having streaks with wins in the couple of dozens. In fact, Moore had not fought a rated opponent until 1939, 4 years and almost 40 fights in his career, that opponent being the #5 Middleweight Teddy Yarosz, whom he lost to. Instead he was mostly winning against very uninspiring competition until Yarosz. He proceeded to draw against a very decent fighter in Freddie Dixon due to a technicality, in a fight he should have won. He lost to Shorty Shoque, a fighter who was basically a fringe contender, but his 2 wins against the respactable Ron Richards, in one of which Moore broke his hand in Ron's head, and some more mundane fighters propelled Moore in the top 10 Middleweight rankings.

    However he yet again lost to Shorty Shoque and then drew with Eddie Booker, a member of the murderer's row, a group of Black fighters who would never win the world title, a group Archie could have very well have been on, had history decided to do things differently. It was this fight that Springs Toledo had mentioned that would really ingite my curiosity for this man. You see, Archie had developed Ulcers from that fight, he was 38 days in the hospital, had lost 35 pounds and had nearly lost his life. In an act of compassion, Booker was a donor that played a part in his recovery. He required stomach surgery, and in the hospital he would contract Blood Poisoning, Pneumonia and appendicitis. He would spent almost an entire year outside of the Ring.

    What he did in that time period is what really made me connect with this man. As Springs Toledo eloquentely said in a way I possibly couldn't do, ''After self-diagnosing the spiritual causes of his ailment, he picked up a mirror and saw a face etched with tension. It was the face of millions of African American men seething under the surface, held down by invisible chains. Moore found that he was holding on to negative feelings in his heart and it had done a number not only on his health, but on his character. He wrote his own prescription for healing remedies that predated the New Age movement by three decades, he listened to jazz, learned to take therapeutic naps, mastered his pseudo-scientific theories of “breathology,” “escapism,” and “relaxism” and overcame what ailed him. It was an achievement that stands as a monument to inspire us all. Moore went deep into an internal cave and battled the dragons lurking in his own humanity. What emerged was a philosopher-king who took hold of a grand mission and slung it on his back. He would not only honor an old promise made to his aunt to refrain from drinking, smoking, or “doing anything shameful in the ring,” he also made a new one to himself. Before George Foreman was even born, Archie Moore would ignore time and its creaking warnings and force his way through the gates of a kingdom that was rightfully his.''

    He may not have been there yet, but the seeds of the Old Mangoose had been planted. And thus his series of fights with the Murderer's row would unfold, and those were likely, the most important of Archie's career.

    He would proceed to beat his previous conqueror Shorty Shoque, and beat the #7 rated Middleweight, murderer's row member Jack Chase. Although he would once again draw with the now #8 rated Eddie Booker. Then he would both win and lose against Jack Chase, and would come up short against another Murderer's row member, Little Tiger Aaron Wade. Another win against Jack Chase, but a loss against Booker and the #3 rated Middleweight, the great Charley Burley. After a run of wins against unranked men, Moore would find himself superior to yet again another Murderer's row member, Lloyd Marshall, the #1 rated Light Heavyweight in the world, beating him twice. He would then lose to the wonderful but still unranked Jimmy Bivins, but would beat Cocoa Kid, completely dropping him from the rankings, and would then both win and lose against the #1 rated Middleweight, the great Holman Williams, yet again another Murderer's row opponent.

    And then he would face his greatest foe of all, the extaordinary Ezzard Charles, losing his first out of three fights against him. But obviously, there's no shame in losing to Charles. Moore would draw against # 5 rated Light Heavyweight Oakland Billy Smith, as well as Jack Chase, before beating Chase in the rematch by KO. #1 rated Light Heavyweight Charles would once again claim victory over Moore, though in a much more competitive fight this time. #2 rated Middleweight and Murderer's row member Bert Lytell and Jimmy Bivins would come up short, before Moore lost for the third and final time against the greatest Light Heavyweight of them all, Ezzard Charles, in what may have been one of the finest Knockouts we might have ever seen had its film been made public.

    #6 and #7 rated Light Heavyweights Charley Williams and Oakland Billy Smith would both be defeated, before Moore got knocked out in 1 shocking round against the #2 rated Leonard Morrow. #6 rated Heavyweight Jimmy Bivins and yet again Oakland Billy Smith would both come up short against Moore, in contrast to #9 Light Heavyweight Henry Hall who would overcome him before losing in a rematch, which is when Moore truly became a force to be reckoned with at Light Heavyweight, leading to a scary streak of destruction in his path. Charley Williams would not go past 7, Bob Satterfield only lasted 3 against Archie, Bivins would go 8, and the amazing Harold Johnson would clearly be outclassed thoroughly. Williams only lasted one round more in the rematch, previous conqueror and now #4 rated Leonard Morrow would get stopped in 10, #5 rated Bert Lytell would only do a bit better than Harold Johnson, Oakland Billy Smith went 8, Jimmy Bivins went 9, #5 rated Heavyweight Karel Sys would fortunately get a draw and the great Harold Johnson would win 1 and lose 2. And finally, after doing everything under the sun to get a title shot, the either 36 or 39 year old Moore would finally get it against Joey Maxim. Moore won practically every round from start to finish and finally became king.

    Moore would then start fighting Heavyweights more frequently, first gaining a win over # 1 rated Heavyweight contender Nino Valdes by an utter schooling. #2 rated Light Heavyweight Maxim would have a lot more sucess than before but would still come up short in their first rematch. But their next fight was just a repeating of the first one. #1 contender Harold Johnson would get stopped in 14. Valdes would again come up short. And the smaller but elite Bobo Olson would get stopped in 3. Now Moore was both the Light Heavyweight champion, and the number 1 rated Heavyweight, and the biggest threat to Marciano. Whose undefeated record would suggest that he won the fight.

    Archie Moore would still carry on as the Light Heavyweight champion, beating #5 rated Yolande Pompey before attempting to gain the greatest prize in all of sports once more against Floyd Patterson, in what would be a losing effort. #4 rated Light Heavyweight Tony Anthony would fall in 7, and then the legendary war against the #3 rated Yvon Durelle, where Durelle eventually went down four times and got stopped in both fights. The bigger but average Willi Besmanoff would only last 10. Age would finally catch up to Moore, albeit far later that it did just about anyone and resulted in Moore losing to # 5 rated Giuli Rinaldi in a non title fight, before Moore beat him in the rematch clearly and decisively. Moore's title reign was now over. Afterwards he would proceed to beat early Muhammad Ali victim, Alejandro Lavorante, before succumping to the greatest Heavyweight of all time himself. Moore was close to 50 years old.

    It is legitimately one of my favorite careers ever. Crazy to think that such a Hollywood type of story exists. The back and forths between the Murderer's row members, including the possibility of eventually belonging in that group due to not getting a title shot, the lossing efforts to the great Charles, the longevity, and the greatest domination that the Light Heavyweight division would ever see after the death of Harry Greb, and maybe ever period.
     
    Bokaj, Clinton, mcvey and 14 others like this.
  2. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,523
    24,694
    Jun 26, 2009
    This reminds me of how the late, great AJ Liebling described Archie’s approach in beating Giulio Rinaldi:

    “Swaying and crouching, he had been working closer to Rinaldi’s body each round, and now he was well within arm’s reach, just occasionally jabbing a straight left into Rinaldi’s face or whacking a right into his body, and then catching the counter, if any, on elbow or wrist as he swayed away. At this point he was like a mechanic working under a car — a tap here, a yank there.”

    Here, for your reading pleasure, is AJ’s thesis “Ahab and Nemesis” on the Marciano-Moore fight. It’s a true masterpiece.

    https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1955/10/08/ahab-and-nemesis

    Thanks for your tribute to the Ol’ Mongoose. One of my favorite fighters and the one I perhaps hold in highest esteem in the holistic sense of what he was as a fighter and who he was as a man.
     
  3. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

    16,090
    17,803
    Sep 22, 2021
    I didn’t have the time to read all this - but you can reach out to Spring via his website and he is very responsive. I sent him a DM and he told me he isn’t here often enough to respond reliably.
     
    Ioakeim Tzortzakis likes this.
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,391
    41,379
    Apr 27, 2005
    Another great thread, keep them coming!! Compact enough that people that steer away from long reads will inhale it in but meaty enough to get some really good info across.
     
  5. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,166
    Dec 16, 2012
    Hosannas on the excellent tribute!
    I have done a thread or 3 about Moore, but did not knwo thee extent of his self-healing.
    A deeply impressive man in every way!

    Sure call him a Mangoose lol! Originally I thought that was just a typo, but it seems just as apropos as Ye Olde...Mongoose! :sisi1:partyhat:
     
    Saintpat and Ioakeim Tzortzakis like this.
  6. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,166
    Dec 16, 2012
    Great article Pat, this if anything shall help cement your formal Canonization into Sainthood. :angel2:

    When I watched that last fight of Marciano's my impression was that he easily could have lost it.
    Not by KO, but outboxed with suck a skilled & slick opponent.
    Few guys today without a size advantage would be able to dominate like that-with a huge power-punch workrate & absorbing all return blows well, it was sheer attrition & a Full Commitment that depleted Moore.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
    Pedro_El_Chef and Saintpat like this.
  7. Gui Dosnera

    Gui Dosnera Member Full Member

    374
    593
    Mar 7, 2023
    Brilliant post.
     
    Clinton, Saintpat, Rumsfeld and 2 others like this.
  8. BoxingFanMike

    BoxingFanMike Member Full Member

    383
    282
    Jul 13, 2014
    Between the original post, and the article in the New Yorker you guys made my morning. Thanks
     
  9. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,885
    8,038
    Jul 17, 2009
    A great post and tribute.
     
  10. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,646
    8,836
    Dec 17, 2018
    Fantastic post.

    Archie Moore is the most difficult fighter I've found to rank, both at LHW & P4P.

    When I completed my all time divisional rankings in 2020 during the Covid lockdown, he washed up at #6 at LHW, which I know many will consider criminally low. His 10-0 LHW WT record, 10-year reign & arguably the deepest win resume in LHW mean that most consider him a lock for the top 2, alongside Charles.

    However, I also factored in prime losses in attempt to get a handle of how dominant fighters were, how far removed from the field in their era, they were, which were key criteria when I came to order the fighters I researched. Of Moore's 72-10-2 record at the weight range I considered LHW (making an allowance for non-title fights contested slightly over the weight), I noted 9 of them as occurring during his prime. The first was vs Eddie Booker, when Moore was aged 30 in his 72nd fight & the last was vs Harold Johnson 3-days before Moore's 38th Birthday. I hardly ever note losses of fighters at that age as prime, but given Moore subsequently went on to beat Johnson twice and his entire 10-year title reign was ahead of him, it made sense that if I was going to credit him for what was to come, all these 9 x defeats needed taking into account, too. Still, I can't help but feel I've probably underrated him at LHW, certainly the vast majority would feel I have.

    The subsequent research I did for Rummy's sticky thread - https://www.boxingforum24.com/threa...deadlines-listed-at-the-top-of-page-1.693501/ - helped me see Moore's career from a different, albeit in a P4P/entire career, perspective, and not just as a LHW. I ranked Moore as the greatest fighter P4P in the 1950's, based solely on fights in that decade.

    Moore went 67-3-2 during the 1950's, his only losses were the aforementioned, and twice avenged, loss to Harold Johnson, whilst the other 2 were both for the HW title, to Marciano & Patterson respectively.]

    He went 9-0 in LHW world title fights in the 50's and his wins in the decade included Harold Johnson (3-1 in total during the 50's), Joey Maxim x 3, 13 & 29.5 lbs heavier Nino Valdes x 2, 19lbs heavier Bob Baker, Oakland Billy Smith, Bobo Olsen, Eddie Cotton, 9lbs heavier Clarence Henry, past prime Jimmy Bivins, Bert Lytell, Yvon Durelle x 2 and Yolande Pompey.

    That's an extraordinary record in the 1950's. Now I've no idea where he should sit in my all time P4P list. He has a lot of losses in the 40's at an age & experience level that can't be considered green, but his 1950's record is astonishingly good.

    I think Archie Moore, more than any other fighter whose career I've studied, has exposed the flaws in the logic I apply when I rank fighters. Analysing his amazing career does my head in.
     
    Clinton, Noel857, Gui Dosnera and 3 others like this.
  11. Ioakeim Tzortzakis

    Ioakeim Tzortzakis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,578
    5,371
    Aug 27, 2020
    It's definitely a head scratcher. At Light Heavyweight I think it's a 3 horse race between Charles, Moore and Greb. Haven't yet researched the entirety of Greb's career so intricately, and I'm kind of scared of doing it, but from memory his resume at the poundage is just as good as Moore's. Tunney, Loughran, Rosenbloom, Levinsky, Norfolk, Dillon etc, it's so stacked that I cannot say with confidence that anyone's is deeper. Moore of course doesn't lack in names either, and unlike Greb he did win the title and had a great reign. Charles of course has Moore on his resume x3 and shares a lot of similar names with him, and he did mostly perform better than Moore. For now, I am leaning towards Charles with some confidence.

    But P4P I certainly think very highly of Archie. I consider him clearly superior to the Fab four aside from Duran, as well as the likes of Chavez, Whitaker, Jones, Monzon, Mayweather, Pacquiao, Saddler, McLarnin, Dixon, Napoles and Griffith. The likes of Canzoneri, Ross and McGovern are closer, but I think Archie still has a much better case than them. Ali and Louis are 50-50 with him, but I remember I did rank Archie higher than Louis a while back, but my opinion on Louis has improved just as much as Archie's. The likes of Gans, Duran, Benny Leonard, Fitzsimmons, Pep and Walker are also very close with Moore, though I do think some have better cases than him. But my top 5 is clear to me. It's Greb, Langford, Robinson, Armstrong and Charles, in that order. And I'm not seeing it changing anytime soon.
     
    Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
    Clinton, mcvey, Pedro_El_Chef and 2 others like this.
  12. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,760
    43,856
    Mar 3, 2019
    Man, if like Springs Toledo's work, you should 100% check out his Harry Greb book if you haven't. Easily the best boxing writing I've ever consumed, and his work across other era such as the Murderer's Row book is incredible too.

    Thanks for such a great thread!
     
  13. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,646
    8,836
    Dec 17, 2018
    At LHW I have Charles #1 & Greb #2.

    According to my notes, Charles went 27-2-1 in fights contested at LHW, including an allowance for fights contested up to 180lbs in non-title fights. His 2 losses, both aged 21 & both avenged, were to Jimmy Bivins & Lloyd Marshall. He beat Moore x 3, Bivins (1-1 in total in that weight range), Oakland Billy Smith x 2, Lloyd Marshall (2-1), Teddy Yarosz & Anton Christoforidis. It's going 3-0 vs Moore that cements top spot for Ezzard, imo.

    At the same weight range, Greb went around 94-6-5. I only consider 5 of those losses to be in & around his prime years, all to great LHWs - Tommy Gibbons (avenged), Gene Tunney x 2 (1 of which most consider a robbery), Tommy Loughran (avenged) and Kid Nofolk when he was past his peak. His win resume in fights contested in the weight range I assigned to LHW, is disgustingly absurd & includes Tommy Loughran (4-1-1), Jack Dillon x 2, Maxie Rosenbloom, Jimmy Delaney x 3, Battling Levinsky x 6 (six), Tiger Flowers, Kid Norfolk (1-1), Gene Tunney (1-2-1), Tommy Gibbons (1-1), Al McCoy, Clay Turner x 4, Jeff Smith, Lou Bogash & Gus Christie.

    By win resume alone, Greb is probably the LHW GOAT with Moore & Charles in contention for the #2 spot, depending on whether you prefer quality or quantity. My rankings are more than just depth of win resume, but factor in prime losses & dominance, to make a determination as to which were the furthest removed from the best of their era. On that basis I have Tunney, Henry-Lewis and Spinks 3, 4 & 5, with Moore at 6.

    If Moore is the LHW I underrate compared to most, JHL is the one I rank more highly than most. In this weight range he went 50-0-3. He went 6-0 in LHW world title fights during his 4-year reign. He beat Maxie Rosenbloom in both their fights in this weight range, Tiger Jack Fox, Al Gainer x 2, Tony Shucco x 2, Bob Olin x 3, Bob Godwin, Jock McAvoy, Len Harvey, Lou Scozza & Fred Lenhart (1-0-1).
     
  14. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,447
    5,127
    Jan 19, 2016
    Oh my word. A J Liebling. In his description of the Archie Moore v Harold Johnson fight he said (I'm quoting from memory but I love 'The Sweet Science' so much, I won't be far off).

    'Archie hit Harold with a left hook to the chops that it is a pleasure to remember not having received.'

    Honestly. I genuinely believe that is the greatest sentence of prose anywhere and the book is the greatest collection of essays, sporting or otherwise, I can recall seeing.

    Mind you, I am not especially well read. Largely because I was happy to re-read AJ's masterpiece over and over again.
     
    Clinton and Saintpat like this.
  15. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,523
    24,694
    Jun 26, 2009
    Possibly topped only by John Lardner’s:

    Stanley Ketchell was twenty-four years old when he was fatally shot in the back by the common-law husband of the lady who was cooking his breakfast.
     
    Eddie Ezzard likes this.