Would Tyson beat Tyson?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Walcott, Oct 29, 2023.


  1. Walcott

    Walcott Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,485
    2,294
    Oct 28, 2023
    Quality wise there's no comparison, Mike Tyson is levels above Tyson Fury. But, the question is, would the size disparity be too much to overcome?

    Today I watched Tyson face Mike Jameson, the size disparity was substantial, but when you take in to account that Jameson was only 6ft 4 and 230 odd pound it makes the proposal of a Fury comparison even more absurd as he would dwarf Jameson.

    I can see Mike winning, but I don't envisage anything clinical, it would be a messy affair with him struggling to land anything significant.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,116
    27,492
    Jan 3, 2007
    Mike Tyson was decisively a better fighter than Tyson Fury. Does this guarantee victory ? No because despite the vast difference in talent and skill, Fury’s enormous size advantage would make it a very hard fight. I’m not totally sure how this one would end
     
    Mike_b, White Bomber and Devon like this.
  3. Walcott

    Walcott Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,485
    2,294
    Oct 28, 2023
    That's what I'm saying. I still fancy Mike in that i don't think Fury would do much apart from spoil and be super defensive. Mike would be the aggressor and pushing the pace, his key work would be to the body IMO.
     
  4. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    Tyson didn’t seem to have much trouble hitting Ribalta an he was 6’6. Right hands, left hooks an uppercuts, all connecting with Ribalta’s head round after round Sure Ribalta who was tough as hell in the Tyson fight,ain’t quite the fighter that Fury is but I can’t see a peak Tyson having that much trouble hitting fury just because of his height. Yeah an also it’s long being said that Fury is really 6’7 not a exaggerated 6’9
     
    Smokin Bert and Sangria like this.
  5. Devon

    Devon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,516
    6,835
    Dec 31, 2018
    I reckon Tyson wins.
     
    chaunceygardina likes this.
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,116
    27,492
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed. I’d hate to pick Fury over Tyson but 6’9” and 270 lbs Is a big gap over 5’11” 220. And let’s face it. For all his shortcomings ( and yes he has many ) Fury isn’t a bum.
     
    Man_Machine and Walcott like this.
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,116
    27,492
    Jan 3, 2007
    Ribalta was commonly billed as 6’4” not 6’6”. And only weighed around 211 for the Tyson fight. Im also struggling to think of one honest contender he’s ever beaten as well.
     
    Walcott likes this.
  8. Walcott

    Walcott Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,485
    2,294
    Oct 28, 2023
    Ribalta was much more engaging than Fury, Fury wouldn't face Tyson like that. His game plan would be to spoil and make it scrappy. Even if he did set out to be more aggressive with the jab and straight right, Tyson's speed and elusiveness would but the frighteners on him.
     
  9. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    Yeah maybe but nevertheless the point was Fury towering over Tyson wouldn’t automatically be a advantage that Tyson couldn’t overcome. Let’s face it just about every fighter that Tyson fought was taller than him or towered over him
     
  10. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    This ain’t about the comparison between Ribalta an Fury as fighters but that height itself as in the size disparity is not enough to overcome Tyson by itself as asked by the op
     
  11. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,466
    7,068
    Nov 17, 2021
    I believe Fury is 6' 7.

    It gives him certain perks, but at the same time: he struggled with fast, skilled men; he got dropped by smaller fighters (he can get up, but it's still a 10-8 round.); and is not a puncher. Prime Tyson has all the tools to take on Fury, who at that point might not get any career-defining performance to prove he was something more that we've already seen, which in my book is not enough.
     
    Pugguy likes this.
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,116
    27,492
    Jan 3, 2007
    I have to kinda disagree. The way you make it sound is that all additional height is the same as if there is no increase in difficulty between a guy who’s 5’ll” to 6’4” to 6’9”. And in truth the bigger opponents got the more Mike Tyson generally struggled with them unless you’re going to drag names like Dave Jaco or Donnie Long into the picture which should he omitted for obvious reasons
     
  13. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,815
    5,511
    Jun 24, 2017
    nope I was trying to say that Tyson had no trouble hitting 6’6 Ribalta so I couldn’t see how Fury been 6’9 would mean that extra 3inches would be too much for Tyson to overcome

    Anyway read the op post below again
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2023
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,116
    27,492
    Jan 3, 2007
    I did read it and the OP post is largely in conjunction with everything I was saying before.
     
  15. J.edwards_

    J.edwards_ Member banned Full Member

    174
    235
    Jul 13, 2023
    After last night… I’m not sure I’d make Fury a favourite over Alex Stewart
     
    Smokin Bert likes this.