Usyk. The whole point of p4p is "if these guys were able to fight at the heavyweight division, they'd dominate." Usyk would have literally done that.
Usyk. But if Fury wins I will put him at least at #3 as well. Heavyweights don’t get enough credit in the P4P rankings.
Depends on which Fury shows up. If he's in good condition, It'd be him. Undisputed in 2 divisions just like Crawford, but with an outrageously better run at CW than Crawford had at 140, and the Joshua+Fury wins would be at least as good as Crawford's 147 run. Inoue is close, but falls just a bit short for me.
Didn't Ngannou already beat Fury according to this forum? Wasn't Wilder still in his prime, while Parker beat Him much easier than Fury? Hard to give Usyk much more credit beating a fraud, as you guys call him. So unless you have him number 1 right now? Beating a useless fighter isn't going to make any difference, considering a non boxer did it first Inoue or Crawford is number 1. I probably lean to Inoue I'd have Usyk as 3 Can't have it both ways guys. If Fury is a fraud and rubbish, we can't give any credit to usyk Imagine if Usyk somehow loses to a bum and fraud? Wow his career will look much worse then, when he couldn't do what Ngannou supposedly did and beat Fury
Before the Francis fight I would have def said Usyk. But after Fury lost to a retired MMA fighter, it definitely does have an impact on the quality of the win to no fault of Usyk.