In the grand scheme of things belts don’t really mean much no one remembers exactly what belt was on the line in a fight from 20 years ago but they do remember the generally agreed beat in the division which was Lennox Lewis or Tyson during the 80’s or Ali during the 70’s etc
What is this negative iq logic? That’s like saying Sugar Ray Robinson wasn’t undisputed cause he didn’t have the IBF.
And people are trying to tell you, the WBO wasn't recognized as one of the top HW belts back then. You're just trying to 'logic' an argument in an illogical manner.
What a silly take. Do you possess the ability to apply critical thinking on a subject, or just winding up posters??